the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / Nikon 24-70/2.8, 24-70/4 on Z7 — 35 mm

Nikon 24-70/2.8, 24-70/4 on Z7 — 35 mm

December 22, 2019 JimK Leave a Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z6 and Z7. You should be able to find all the posts about those cameras in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Nikon Z6/7”.

In the previous post, I looked at the real-world performance of the 24-70/2.8 Nikkor S on the Z7, comparing it to the 24-70/4 Nikkor S kit lens. This post covers performance at 35 mm focal length.

Here’s the scene with some trees 47 meters from the camera:

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, center, f/2.8

Making three shots for each variation and picking the sharpest, I exposed at base ISO of 64.  I used AF-S and a small spot, focusing on the target grove of trees.

Capture conditions were:

  • Heaviest RRS legs
  • Arca Swiss C1
  • 2 second self-timer
  • Electronic shutter
  • ISO 64

Images developed in Lightroom, with default settings except:

  • WB set to cloudy
  • Exposure to equalize brightness
  • Adobe Color Profile
  • Sharpening 20, radius 1, detail 0
  • Pick the best of three images at each test condition

I did not try to defeat Lightroom’s silent distortion correction.

We’ll look at some tight crops.

If you’ve seen these here before, just jump to the images. If not, I need to spend some time telling you how to interpret them. They’re at roughly  250% magnification, enlarged to 700 pixels high on export from Lightroom. If you just want a rough idea of the differences, just look at the images as displayed in-line in the posts. However, if you wish to compare these images in detail, you should view these images by clicking on them to see the source files, then set your browser for 100% zooming. Even better, download them and make Photoshop stacks.

No matter what you do, these crops are all going to look horrible. I’m blowing them up so much so that they will represent the original file after JPEG’s discrete cosine transform has had its way with them. If you want to get a good idea of what the images would look like printed, get far away from your monitor. No, farther than that. Put a bunch of the images up on the screen and back up until the best one starts to look good. Then look at the others. There’s another reason why these images won’t look like the best thing the camera/lens combination can deliver. They’re demosaiced with Lightroom. Lightroom is not awful, but for a particular image, there are usually better raw processors. I use Lr because it’s a de facto standard, because I know it well, and because it’s got good tools for dealing with groups of images.

Here’s how to use these highly-magnified crops. The dimensions of the Z7 sensor is 8256×5504 pixels. If we make a full-frame print from the Z7 on a printer with 360 pixels per inch native driver-level resolution, like the Epson inkjet printers, we’ll end up with a 23×15 inch (58×39 cm) print. The 317×246 pixel crop you’re looking at will end up 0.8×0.68 inches (2.12×1.74 cm).  Let’s imagine that you or your viewers are critical, and will look at the 22×15 inch print from about 18 inches (conventional wisdom is that the distance would be a little greater than that, or 28 inches (the diagonal), but you did buy a high-resolution camera for a reason, didn’t you?).

The next step is dependent on your monitor pitch, which you may or may not know. Turns out, you don’t have to know it. Just take the 250% crops and view then at 1:1. How high are they? Get out your ruler and measure, or just guess. Let’s say they are 6 inches high. 6 inches is about 7 times 0.8, so in order to view the crops the way they’d look from 18 inches on the print is to view them from 7 times as far away, or 10.5 feet.

Everything here scales proportionately. If the image on your screen is bigger than 6 inches, increase your viewing distance by the ratio of your image height to 6 inches. If you think your viewers are going to almost get their nose to that print and look at it from six inches, divide that 10.5 feet by 3, and look at the image on the monitor from three and a half feet away.

In the center of the frame:

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, center, f/2.8

 

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, center, f/4

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35mm, center, f/4

 

The faster lens is definitely better when they’re both at f/4.

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, center, f/5.6

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35mm, center, f/5.6

The difference is about the same at f/5.6.

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, center, f/8

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35mm, center, f/8

 

Getting a bit closer.

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, center, f/11

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35mm, center, f/11

Even at f/11, the more expensive lens is slightly better. This may be mostly due to better flare characteristics.

In the upper-right corner:

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f.2.8

 

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f/4

 

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f/4

The faster lens is slightly better.

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f.5.6

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f/5.6

The same relationship applies.

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f/8

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f/8

Again, the differences are small.

24-70 mm f/2.8 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f/11

 

24-70 f/4 Nikkor S, at 35 mm, corner, f/11

The faster lesn is very good. For the price, the kit lens is great.

 

Nikon Z6/7

← Nikon 24-70/2.8, 24-70/4 on Z7 — 24 mm Nikon 24-70/2.8, 24-70/4 on Z7 — 70 mm →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.