In the past few posts on MTF testing, we’ve seen so many things that affect the Imatest MTF50 results that it’s reasonable to look at tests that change very little to find out how much instability there is in the baseline test protocol and the image analysis tools. I made 128 exposures at f/4 with… [Read More]
MTF testing of 70-200mm lenses — more exposure effects
In this post, found that, with Lightroom (Lr) development, the Imatest MTF50 results were somewhat dependent on exposure. Compensating for actual exposure changes with Lr development Exposure moves mitigated this to a great extent. Is the same thing true with DCRAW development? I developed the raw files from the previous 2-stop range in 1/3 stop… [Read More]
MTF testing of 70-200mm lenses — Exposure effects
I’ve been reporting on the modulation transfer function results from some lens/sensor testing that I’ve been doing. I few days ago, I show you some work that I’d done with the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 GII ED on the Nikon D810 to the Sony 70-200 f/4 G OSS FE on a Sony a7RII. I’ve been having… [Read More]
Bill Claff’s web site has moved
If you’re interested in photographic tech and you’re not scared of quantitative information, my guess is that you’ll like BIll Claff’s web site, He’s gotten many people to test cameras to his protocols, and he reports the results with interactive graphs that allow easy comparison. In addition, there’s a wealth of information on what’s inside… [Read More]
Aesthetics as a factor in photographic equipment choice
I’ve got to stop hanging around over at DPR. Not only is it a time sink, I keep getting ideas for posts to write here. Yesterday, a guy was asking one of the “what lens should I buy for xyz?” questions that are the stock in trade of camera forums. In the discussion, he rejected… [Read More]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 320
- 321
- 322
- 323
- 324
- …
- 573
- Next Page »