the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / Technology Hall of Shame / Tech hall of shame: Amazon Kindle

Tech hall of shame: Amazon Kindle

December 23, 2010 JimK 2 Comments

This one’s a Brooks Jensen nominee. Brooks gives the reason why the Kindle deserves a place in the THoS:
for not including ePub as one of their acceptable formats thereby eliminating 99% of library eBooks from being read on the Kindle. Is Amazon so singularly focused on selling eBooks that they can’t allow us to use their device to read free ones?
Ah yes. I can just see some junior product manager suggesting that the Kindle handle open formats. The senior manager speaks: “Haven’t you been paying attention? We’ve got this razors-and-razor-blades pricing strategy that guarantees that we’re not gonna make any money on the hardware, and you want to make it easy for some customer to freeload by buying our hardware and reading somebody else’s books?”
“B-b-but the customer experience…” stammers the young guy, the ink on his MBA still wet.
“Forget that,” says his boss. “This is a vehicle to sell books.”
Good one, Brooks. But I have to give props to Amazon for not tying their books to their hardware. I’ve read Kindle books on a PC, an IPod Touch, an IPad, and a Droid X. Since they’re making the money on the books, it’s to their benefit to let a hundred platforms bloom. I’ve owned two Kindles, but no longer use one. If I want to, I can read ePub books on my iPad.

This one’s a Brooks Jensen nominee. Brooks gives the reason why the Kindle deserves a place in the THoS:

…for not including ePub as one of their acceptable formats thereby eliminating 99% of library eBooks from being read on the Kindle. Is Amazon so singularly focused on selling eBooks that they can’t allow us to use their device to read free ones?

Ah yes. I can just see some junior product manager suggesting that the Kindle handle open formats. The senior manager speaks: “Haven’t you been paying attention? We’ve got this razors-and-razor-blades pricing strategy that guarantees that we’re not gonna make any money on the hardware, and you want to make it easy for some customer to freeload by buying our hardware and reading somebody else’s books?”

“B-b-but the customer experience…” stammers the young guy, the ink on his MBA still wet.

“Forget that,” says his boss. “This is a vehicle to sell books.”

Good one, Brooks. But I have to give props to Amazon for not tying their books to their hardware. I’ve read Kindle books on a PC, an IPod Touch, an IPad, and a Droid X. Since they’re making the money on the books, it’s to their benefit to let a hundred platforms bloom. I’ve owned two Kindles, but no longer use one. If I want to, I can read ePub books on my iPad.

Here’s a win-win. Amazon could introduce an “unlocked Kindle”, that can read ePub and some other common formats, and costs more, so they can make money even if the customer doesn’t buy any Amazon books.

Technology Hall of Shame

← Tech hall of shame: Blu-Ray Antialiasing, part 1 →

Comments

  1. Douglas Stocks says

    December 26, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    We may now purchase ebooks from our local independent bookstores and at the same time support the experience of having print books in a true browser setting. We may now go to our local booksellers website and buy our ebooks for all devices, Sony, Nook, IPad, laptop and desktop. All but the proprietary Kindle.

    Reply
  2. chester says

    December 27, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    I think the hardware for these single function e-readers will eventually give way to the multi-function tablets that have more utility and with the ability to read multiple formats. That may force the industry to reduce the number of formats.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.