• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 4 24mm lenses on the D810, part 3

4 24mm lenses on the D810, part 3

April 13, 2015 JimK 7 Comments

This is a continuation of the lens test of the previous post. The lenses are:

  • Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG Art
  • AF-S Nikkor 24mm f/1.4 G ED
  • AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED
  • PC-E Nikkor 24mm f/3.5 D ED

Today we test all four lenses at f/8 and f/11.

In the center:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor tilt/shift
Nikkor tilt/shift

Yawn…

In the corner:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor tilt/shift
Nikkor tilt/shift

The Sigma wins. The Nikkor f/1.4 is next. The zoom is OK. The tilt/shift remains a huge disappointment.

At f/11:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor tilt/shift
Nikkor tilt/shift

Not much difference. A tad softer than at f/8, but not enough to keep f/11 from being useful.

In the corner:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor tilt/shift
Nikkor tilt/shift

The tilt/shift is starting to come around, but it’s not as good as either the Sigma or the Nikkor f/1.4. The Sigma’s the best. The Nikkor f/1.4 CA never did resolve. The zoom is once again, good for a zoom.

Summary: The Sigma is quite a lens. The Nikkor 24mm f/1.4 has been dethroned. The 24-70 is pretty good at 24mm. The tilt/shift lens is a disappointment. [Turns out that the tilt/shift problems are due to field curvature.]

 

The Last Word

← 4 24mm lenses on the D810, part 2 Field curvature with the 24mm f/3.5 PC-E Nikkor →

Comments

  1. Eric Hanson says

    April 13, 2015 at 9:00 am

    Apparently the tilt shift work best at f4 and f11. However of course you tested it at f11… 🙂 Ming Thein uses this lens and mentioned the f4 and f11.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      April 13, 2015 at 9:36 am

      I didn’t like the corners at f/4, either. And that was with the movements centered!

      Reply
  2. Gerald says

    April 13, 2015 at 3:07 pm

    I wonder if the poor performance of the PC-E Nikkor 24mm f / 3.5 D ED is due to the tilt adjustment is a little off. It would not be a surprise if the mechanical zero was slightly different from the optical zero.

    Reply
  3. Jack Hogan says

    April 14, 2015 at 12:36 am

    The sigma Art looks like a real champ, I am going to have to get me one of these. In the corner it appears sharpest at f/8, confirming Lenstip’s
    chart http://www.lenstip.com/430.4-Lens_review-Sigma_A_24_mm_f_1.4_DG_HSM_Image_resolution.html

    Reply
  4. Jack Hogan says

    April 14, 2015 at 12:37 am

    PS How about those maze artifacts in the blinds, eh?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      April 14, 2015 at 6:33 am

      Spectacular, aren’t they? And all four lenses were sharp enough to trigger them and the false color at f/5.6.

      Thanks, Jack.

      Jim

      Reply
      • CarVac says

        April 14, 2015 at 8:42 am

        That’s when you use a different demosaic algorithm like Amaze or LMMSE, though Lightroom offers no choice in the matter.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.