• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 4 24mm lenses on the D810, part 1

4 24mm lenses on the D810, part 1

April 13, 2015 JimK 3 Comments

The new Sigma 24mm f/1.4 Art lens is getting a lot of good press these days, and I thought it might be instructive to do one of my informal tests that included it.

I rounded up the following 24mm lenses:

  • Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG Art
  • AF-S Nikkor 24mm f/1.4 G ED
  • AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED
  • PC-E Nikkor 24mm f/3.5 D ED

The camera was a Nikon D810, operated with EFCS on and a 3-second shutter delay programmed in, manually focused in the center. The raw files were developed in Lightroom 5.7.1 with default settings. The zoom was tested at 24mm only, and the PC-E Nikkor, a tilt/shift lens, was tested with the movements centered. Here’s the scene, with each lens wide open:

Sigma
Sigma
24mm Nikkor G
24mm Nikkor G
24-70 Nikkor
24-70 Nikkor
24mm tilt/shift Nikkor
24mm tilt/shift Nikkor

The edge falloff is the worst for the faster lenses, as you’d expect, and pretty much non-existent for the tilt/shift lens, also as you’d expect.

The center blown up 3:1, at f/1.4 for the two lenses that are that fast:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor f/1.4
Nikkor f/1.4

The Sigma is sharper, punchier, and doesn’t suffer from the veiling haze that the Nikkor has, which makes the center look like it is overexposed.

Upper right corner:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4

Not bad for f/1.4 with a lens this wide. It’s close for sharpness, but I’d give the nod to the Nikkor. The Nikkor has more chromatic aberration.

Stopping both lenses down to f/2:

 

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor 24 f/1.4
Nikkor 24 f/1.4

The Sigma is sharper, has better contrast. It isn’t even close.

In the corner:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4

The Sigma is sharper and more contrasty than the Nikkor, and has less CA.

At f/2.8, we can include the Nikkor zoom:

 

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor zoom

The Sigma is the sharpest, followed by the Nikkor 24mm, with the zoom surprisingly close.

In the corner:

Sigma
Sigma
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4
Nikkor 24mm f/1.4
Nikkor zoom
Nikkor zoom

The Sigma and the Nikkor 24mm are very close for sharpness. The Nikkor zoom is very soft by comparison, but not bad for a zoom wide open. There is CA apparent in all three images, with the Sigma having the least,and the Nikkors about tied for second place.

Next up, all four lenses at f/4.

The Last Word

← Heavy and light tripods with Sony a7R, a7II 4 24mm lenses on the D810, part 2 →

Comments

  1. Andre Y says

    April 13, 2015 at 11:23 am

    Jim, thanks for doing these tests and sharing your results. The Sigma looks very good.

    I have to wonder if we’re seeing the PCE’s field curvature. As far as aberrations, it doesn’t look too bad in the corner, just out of focus.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      April 13, 2015 at 11:58 am

      If it were field curvature wouldn’t it improve dramatically as I stopped down?

      Reply
  2. Andre Y says

    April 13, 2015 at 12:25 pm

    Maybe it’s really curved? I’m not sure. If you set focus on the corner, does it get sharper there?

    I’m asking mostly out of curiosity: I have the 24 PCE, and only use it at f/8 and 11, usually with some movement applied, mostly for landscapes, and have been satisfied with my results. It is definitely not the easiest lens to use.

    The lens also has a reputation for being somewhat fragile and easy to get out of whack, too. That’s mostly been anecdotal with no good evidence.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.