• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report — Matchprints & mechanicals

A book report — Matchprints & mechanicals

July 17, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

This is part of a series about my experiences in publishing a book.The series starts here.

I met with Jerry Takigawa yesterday, and he showed me several things that Hemlock had provided:

  • A complete mechanical proof of the book, with low resolution and inaccurate color.
  • A mechanical proof of the dust cover, showing how the French fold will work, and the die-cut rounded edges that I added to keep the corners from snagging.
  • A set of all the book pages printed using the Kodak Matchprint contract proofing process (Kodak licensed the name from 3M some time ago, and the current version has nothing to do with 3M’s four layer technology.
  • A Matchprint proof of the dust jacket
  • A set of proofs showing the locations where the varnish will be added.
  • A proof of the dust jacket that had been laminated with the same material we’re going to use of the real dust jacket.

Basically, things looked pretty good. Jerry and I agreed that he’d find someone to do one last proofreading pass; nothing like having a thousand copies of some oopsie that makes your face red every time you see it.

The die-cut rounding on the dust jacket looks like it will do what I had hoped. Jerry was a little worried that it was too close to my headshot, but I think it’ll be fine.

I checked the mechanicals briefly, then asked Jerry to get them to the proofreader. I took the Matchprints home.

Today, I went over the Matchprints. There were three images that needed some more work. On one of them, an area near the top that looked of on the crop that I normally use looked weird when the image was set up for a full-bleed page. I cropped it in Lr, then converted it to CMYK. There were two images that just lost their oomph in the Matchprint at the size they were going to be in the book. I fixed them in Lr, and converted them to CMYK.

My next worry is the spot-color type that we’re using for captions and the footer. The text of both of these is pretty small, and it’s hard to read when it’s gray. We’re currently using a Pantone black/white ink mix at 50% of each. I asked Jerry what he thought about taking that up to 60% black, 40% white. That will affect some other areas of the book where Jerry is using that spot color as a graphic element. It will also affect, in a good way, I think, a few places in the book where there is white text against that spot color used as a background.

I also asked Jerry if we could loosen up the leading in the captions to make them more readable.

There were a couple of places where the text in the footer looked like the letters had different weighting. I expect that this is due to the Matchprint’s inability to precisely simulate spot colors, but I asked Jerry to talk to Hemlock and see what they thought.

 

The Last Word

← Depth of Field summary — part 2 A book report — spot color proofing →

Comments

  1. Erik Kaffehr says

    July 20, 2016 at 12:56 am

    Hi Jim,

    It seems that there is an impressive lot of consideration in high quality printing of a photo book! I would never known…

    Thanks for sharing!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.