• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report — page flatness and glue

A book report — page flatness and glue

April 18, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

This is a continuation of a series of posts that I started what seems like a long time ago about getting a book designed and published. The series starts here.

I’ve been working with Jerry Takigawa, and representatives from both Hemlock (the printer) and Roswell (the bindery) on how to get the pages to lie flatter than they have in the dummies that Roswell has made, and Jerry has made some progress.

What the dummies have looked like:

kasson dummy

What we want the dummies to look like:

What we want the book to look like.

We tried 8 page signatures instead of 16 page ones. No joy. We tried thicker paper. No help there, either.

We now think it comes down to the glue.

The glue that Roswell is using for Smyth-bound (sewn and glued) books is called polyurethane reactive (PUR) glue. It is strong, and is advertised as being flexible (more on that shortly), and it sets up quickly. It was originally intended for perfect-bound books, where there is no stitching and the glue has to do all the work of keeping the book from falling apart. Roswell now uses it for Smyth-bound books as well.

However, the tradeoffs between flexibility and strength are different for perfect and Smyth bound books, and Jerry suspects that the PUR is the cause of our page flatness problems. A glue that was formerly widely used for Smyth bound books is polyvinyl acetate (PVA). It’s a very common adhesive, also known as white glue. Elmer’s glue is a form of PVA. It is more flexible than PUR, but not as strong.

PVA is also less viscous than PUR, and takes longer to set up. That leads to a problem with Smyth bound books: the glue can migrate through the holes in the pages caused by the stitching, and glue little pieces of the pages together. You know that cracking sound that you sometimes hear when you first open a book? That could be the pages unsticking themselves.

That unsticking is a problem if there’s an image flowing across the gutter and it pulls little bits on ink off the page, leaving little white dots. Ugly, right?

The current plan is to go with PVA anyway. Jerry is going to re-layout the book so that none of the 13 images that currently span the gutter do so on the inside of a signature, where the page-sticking problem is likely to occur. We’re going back to 16 page signatures to give us better odds on that.

Jerry’s getting a PVA-glued dummy made. Cross your fingers.

The Last Word

← Image noise and print size A book report — varnish options →

Comments

  1. James Cho says

    April 19, 2016 at 2:23 pm

    I’ve been using MyPublisher (similar to Blurb that you mentioned in the beginning of the series). They have an interesting technology to provide layflat pages.

    https://www.mypublisher.com/photobooks/layflatpages

    My maximum run of books is only 2 or 3 copies so this works for me.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      April 19, 2016 at 2:28 pm

      Yes, indeed. There are a lot of interesting options if you’re not doing a long run on an offset press.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.