• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / a7rII read noise vs shutter speed

a7rII read noise vs shutter speed

August 6, 2015 JimK 4 Comments

I set the shutter to single shot, the ISO to 6400, turned off all the noise reduction options that the a7RII exposes to the user, and made a series of dark-field exposures at shutter speeds in 1/3 stop intervals from 1/2000 until boredom set in. Here’s the way the read noise varied:

a7rii single rn vs shutter

You can see the camera applying some kind of noise reduction at shutter speeds of 1 second and slower. This undefeatable, gratuitous noise reduction is not unique to the a7RII; I’ve seen it in other alpha 7 cameras. Nor is it unique to Sony; I’ve seen it in Nikons.

That doesn’t mean I have to like it.

In continuous mode, here’s what we see:

a7rii cont rn vs shutter

Same thing. Note that at ISO 6400, the sensor-referred read noise is sufficiently large that the 12 bit precision and noisier ADC in continuous mode makes no difference in the overall noise level.

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII self-heating Nikon D810 vs Sony a7RII dark-field noise →

Comments

  1. Kiril says

    August 8, 2015 at 1:17 pm

    You did turn off the long exposure noise reduction right? I am just noting that that type of noise reduciton is applied in long exposure i.e. exposure longer than 1 seocnd for example….

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 8, 2015 at 2:09 pm

      AS I said in the post, I turned off all user-controllable noise reduction. That includes LENR.

      Jim

      Reply
  2. Seth Ellis says

    August 8, 2015 at 1:38 pm

    Is this why I saw a “star gobbler” thread a while ago where Sony was cleaning up stars during long exposure night shots? Is there any way around this to get the best night sky/milky way pictures with the Sony FF cameras? I currently use an A7 and have just started experimenting with night sky starscapes.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 8, 2015 at 2:11 pm

      Is this why I saw a “star gobbler” thread a while ago where Sony was cleaning up stars during long exposure night shots?

      Probably.

      Is there any way around this to get the best night sky/milky way pictures with the Sony FF cameras?

      Stack 30-second exposures. That also reduces noise.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.