• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Another medium tele test — seat of the pants color

Another medium tele test — seat of the pants color

March 7, 2016 JimK 3 Comments

This is a continuation of a test of the following lenses on the Sony a7RII:

  • Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 Batis.
  • Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 Otus.
  • Leica 90mm f/2 Apo Summicron-M ASPH.
  • AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 G.
  • Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro.

The test starts here.

It is a widely-held belief that lenses have subtle differences in their color rendition that can’t be corrected for in post processing. I’ve never been a believer myself, but I’ll be doing a little testing fo the color differences among our five teles.

I photographed a Macbeth ColorChecker with the five lenses all set to f/8, (I had to guess with the Nikon, since it’s a G lens; I used the histogram. The shutter speed was 1/50 for all the shots, and the ISO setting was 100, so differences in transmission among the lenses will show up as brightness variations.

Lighting was two Westcott LED panels set to D50. For this first test, the files were developed in Lr CC 2015.4, with default settings, except that WB for all was set to the third gray patch from the left on the image made with the Batis. Thus any WB differences are not calibrated out.

Otus
Otus
Batis
Batis
Nikon
Nikon
Leica
Leica
Sony
Sony

And now, the same files with each image balanced to the third gray patch from the left.

Otus
Otus
Batis
Batis
Nikon
Nikon
Leica
Leica
Sony
Sony

And now, the files processed as immediately above, but with the exposure control adjusted to even out the readings for that hard-working third gray patch from the right.

Otus
Otus
Batis
Batis
Nikon
Nikon
Leica
Leica
Sony
Sony

A few caveats:

  • The images are presented here in sRGB, so the cyan patch, correctly rendered, is out of gamut and should probably be ignored.
  • I don’t think that Lr did lens-specific color corrections, but you never know with Lightroom.

To come, DCRAW development, and, what you’ve all been waiting for, numbers and graphs.

 

The Last Word

← Another medium tele test — more bokeh Another medium tele test — animated color →

Comments

  1. Michael Demeyer says

    March 7, 2016 at 11:28 pm

    Jim,

    Both of the first two sets say white balance set based on third gray patch from the left. Did you mean something different?

    Michael

    Reply
    • Jim says

      March 8, 2016 at 7:14 am

      First set: white balance set based on third gray patch from the left of the Batis image.

      Second set: white balance set based on third gray patch from the left of each image.

      I’ll see if I can make it clearer in the text.

      Thanks,

      Jim

      Reply
  2. Philip says

    March 11, 2016 at 7:36 am

    I have always believed that colours in photoshop can be edited to anything. However, without owning every lens or without bringing colour charts, it is difficult to mimic the look of another lens. Often, a reference is needed, and that reference might only apply to one situation. If someone were willing to make colour profiles under various conditions, presets could exist similar to what VSCO has created. I like the look of my Zeiss lens, and while I don’t doubt it is technically possible to mimic with another lens, it is easier for me to just use the Zeiss lens.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.