• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Arca Swiss C1 head review

Arca Swiss C1 head review

December 30, 2021 JimK 3 Comments

Since I’ve been reviewing geared heads, I might as well include what I consider to be the gold standard, the Arca Swiss C1.

It’s big. It’s heavy. It’s expensive.

 

It’s got plus and minus 30 degrees of pitch and roll, and that’s before its trick move (see below)

 

Nice bubble levels. Lock for the top yaw is at the top of the picture. lock for the bottom yaw is at the bottom of the head, in the middle. There is a version with geared top yaw. I have one, and it works well.

 

A good view of the top yaw lever. The roll and pitch knobs are rubberized, and fee quite different from the knob on the clamp, which is a good thing.

 

Max roll in one direction

 

Max roll in the other direction

 

Max pitch in one direction

 

Max pitch in the other direction

 

And here’s the trick. There is non-geared pitch of up to 60+ degrees. Combined with the 30 degrees of geared pitch, you can point the camera straight up or down. Or you can change the orientation of the yaw control, and shoot a vertical (if your tripod doesn’t fall over).

 

If you can deal with the weight and the cost, and the fact that it’s a bit fragile, this is an outstanding geared head. Bring money: about $1500 without geared yaw, and $2000 with it. Don’t get the cheesy Arca cam clamp; get the screw clamp.

 

The Last Word

← Swebo precision geared head GFS 50S high-ISO behavior and LrC development →

Comments

  1. Robert says

    January 2, 2022 at 7:30 am

    Hi Jim
    Talking about tripods and heads: The last picture is blurred 😉
    But many thanks for the pointing me to non-geared pitch. Didn’t save money, but probably disappointment and hassle.
    ..and thanks for the essay on higher ISO – reminded me to test my cameras.
    Stay healthy and best regards!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 2, 2022 at 7:36 am

      The last picture is blurred because of subject motion. 8 second exposure with me holding it so it wouldn’t tip over.

      Reply
      • Robert says

        January 2, 2022 at 11:19 pm

        Seeing your fingers I thought so, couldn‘t withstand Thank you for your essays – although I do not understand every post (rather not into natural sciences), I often find very useful tips!

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.