the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Autofocus on the a7RII

Autofocus on the a7RII

August 19, 2015 JimK 3 Comments

The Sony alpha 7 R Mark II (a7RII) has a new autofocus system that combines contrast-detection and phase autofocus with about 400 (the mind reels — how do they cover these up in the raw files?) phase detection autofocus points.

The new system has eye detection added to the old face detection, which I never used, although it got some good press. I will report on eye detection, but not in this post.

The new system is much faster and more accurate in fluid situations than the one on the a7R, which isn’t saying much. It’s better than the one on the a7II, which is a somewhat higher bar. So far, I’ve tested it with the Zony 35mm f/2.8 FE, the Sony 90mm f/2.8 OSS macro lens, and the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 OSS zoom.

In the old cameras, when I used autofocus at all, which wasn’t often, I used the flexible spot mode, in which the photographer places a spot — which can have one of three different sizes — over the area she wishes to be in focus. It worked fairly well, with the emphasis on fair. I was not good at tracking moving subjects in continuous focusing mode, and it sometimes focused on other than the intended object, and sometimes on a seemingly-random distance. That was true to varying degrees, with the a7, the a7R, the a7S, and the a7II.

The new camera is much improved. While I wouldn’t put it up there with the D4, or even the D800, in tracking a moving subject, it has the advantage that it doesn’t need calibration (although calibration can make it faster). And it has tricks the D4 and D810 can’t even think about, since they’re SLRs.

Throwing caution to the winds, I set the camera up in AF-A mode, where it can pick between single and continuous AF, picked the “Wide” focus point selection, in which the camera can decide what it thinks is important (it shows you what it’s focusing on, so you can try again if it’s not the right thing), and took a bunch of pictures of my grandchildren.

Here’s a shot with no Lr processing other than cropping:

_DSC0866-3

This was shot as ISO 800 to get the high conversion gain, with the exposure compensation dialed back 1 2/3 stops, wide open, with the 90mm f/2.8 macro.

Applying a few global corrections in Lr:

_DSC0866

Toning down the corners and adding a single local correction:

_DSC0866-2

Cloning out the distracting dark part:

_DSC0866-4

 

Checking focus at 2:1 magnification:

_DSC0866-5

Pretty darned good, especially with the strong backlight. I didn’t try to reduce the noise, which is certainly there thanks to the high resolution of the camera and the strong push the face got.

Here’s another example, with the Zony 35/2.8, shot in landscape wide open, cropped to a vertical:

_DSC1141

Checking focus at 2:1:

_DSC1141-2

It doesn’t get much better than that.

The Last Word

← Comparing a7RII and a7II long exposure self heating Sony a7RII long exposure noise reduction →

Comments

  1. Max Berlin says

    August 20, 2015 at 7:41 am

    Jim, sorry but that is horrible detail on the eyes. Nice looking kids though.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 20, 2015 at 8:07 am

      2x @ 42 MP. Pushed really hard in the first one. Default sharpening and NR. I think it’s more than respectable. And the focus, which was the point of the post, is bang-on. This camera, like the H2D-39 (and to some extent the D810), has the ability to astonish me when I zoom in to 1:1 or 1:2 in Lr.

      Reply
  2. Walter Burhans says

    September 2, 2015 at 11:05 am

    If the AF is really everything the early reports say it is, this is groundbreaking. Sony will have obviated the need to use native lenses for decent autofocus performance and opened up the a7RII to an entire library of lenses, without the compromise in AF performance.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • Darrel Crilley on Fuji 100-200/5.6 on GFX, Nikon 70-200/@2.8E, Apo-Sonnar 135 on Z7, revisited

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.