• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Dynamic Sony a7RII battery draw

Dynamic Sony a7RII battery draw

November 1, 2016 JimK 11 Comments

This is the first of a series of posts on the dynamic behavior of the Sony a7RII battery drain. To navigate to all the other posts in the series, scroll down to the bottom of this page (below the comments) and you’ll find pingback links to each of them.

A couple of weeks ago, I reported on static measurements that I made on the Sony a7rII’s current draw from an external ac power supply which replaced the battery. The results, while providing some illumination, were not satisfying in that I couldn’t measure the dynamic behavior of the current draw, and it was clear that the way the current varied with time was interesting. When I did some rough dynamic tests of voltage variation in operation — which I took as a possible proxy for current variation — it appeared that the current changed quite rapidly. I didn’t know the half of it then, and I’m still learning. 

When I tried to measure dynamic current variations using a oscilloscope and a 0.1 ohm shunt, I ran into all kinds of grounding and noise problems. The low bandwidth setting of the scope I was using is 20 MHz, which was a lot higher than I needed or wanted, but I didn’t have a convenient way to lower it (I expect to have that problem solved in a few days). In addition, there were grounding issues. I should point out in this context that 1 ma through 0.1 ohm yields 100 microvolts.

In an attempt to cut down on high-frequency noise introduced in the setup and deal with grounding problems. I bought a cheap USB charger for the Sony a7x batteries, and tore it apart so that I could use it to power the camera with an external battery instead of an ac power supply. I also purchased a Keithley 2100 6 1/2 digit multimeter, which allows me to make dc current measurements with a 0.1 ohm shunt resistance on the 1 amp and 3 amp ranges. The camera doesn’t like much more than that; it certainly doesn’t like 1 ohm. 

With all that, I was able to look at the basic current draw of a (different serial number from last time) a7RII running firmware 2.0 with the LCD active and set to High. Here’s what happens when you power up the camera for about ten seconds, the turn off the power switch:

a7rii-basic-draw

Well, that’s quite a range of currents. Let’s look at it with a logarithmic vertical scale:

a7rii-basic-draw-log

Several things are evident:

  • When powered up, the camera’s current draw is not constant, but varies between about a quarter of an amp and two-fifths of an amp.
  • The camera shuts down in three stages.
  • The first stage drops the battery drain briefly to about a fifth of an amp.
  • The second stage takes it to about 5 milliamps for about 40 seconds.
  • The final stage takes it to a bit over one milliamp. This stage lasts for at least 12 hours — I’ve tested it overnight, but not in recording mode, so it could have changed while I wasn’t looking.

Switching back to linear current and looking at just the period when the camera was on, here’s what we see:

a7rii-basic-draw-exp-time

It’s clear that the DMM’s sampling rate of 40 samples/second is not fast enough to prevent aliasing. Until I can figure out how to get the data out faster (the meter is supposed to be able to same at 2000 points/second, but I haven’t figured out how to look at the data), we’re not going to have clarity on exactely what’s going on during the active period.

If we look at the current once the camera has gone to its lowest-draw mode, here’s what we see:

a7rii-idle-current-1-per-sec

I don’t think we’re just looking at noise here; the distribution is too asymmetric for that. Rather, the camera is occacionally drawing 30 or 40 microamps more than is typical. What does that mean? I’ve no idea.

Before we saw the camera dropping into a very low draw when the battery replacement was inserted into a camera that’s turned off. I have not been able to reproduce that with this camera and my new setup. 

a7rii-plug-in-battery

What happens when we fire off a few shots with EFCS on in both single shot and continuous mode? I’m glad you asked:

a7rii-cont-ss-efcs-on

The first two peaks at in single shot mode, and the last group is in continuous. Note that the peak current draw is over an amp! It may be even higher because of the 40 samples/second limitation.

Here’s a closer look at the continuous burst:

a7rii-cont-ss-efcs-on-exp-t

It’s clearly aliased. I’ll be working on that.

I set the meter to average 100 readings, and did some tests of average current draw with the camera active, but not shooting pictures. Here’s what I found, with a freshly-charged battery:

  • LCD on, display set to High, black screen (lens cap on), finder brightness Manual, set to +-0: 332 ma
  • LCD on, display set to High, bright screen (some 100+ zebras): 332 ma
  • LCD on, display set to Standard, black screen: 295 ma
  • Short-term idle current: 5.27 ma
  • Long-term idle current: 1.34 ma.

 

Added 11/4:

I now realize that things are a lot more complicated than in indicated above. You can read about that here.

Added 11/7:

Also, I now understand that the sampling rates in the Keithley DMM driver are – very — approximate. The software does, however, time stamp each reading to millisecond precision. In the  future I’ll be uning the time stamps rather than assuming that the sampling rate is right, and the time axis should be a lot more accurate. I’m not going to go back and rework the above plots, since I don’t think the precise times are particularly important to the main point here.

 

 

The Last Word

← A book report — portfolio image quality Sony a7RII battery draw — high sample rate →

Comments

  1. Bruce Oudekerk says

    November 1, 2016 at 2:04 pm

    Are your test a7RII(s) in Airplane Mode and if not how is your WiFi set up on your cameras?

    And at the risk of displaying my ignorance, what other functions (in these or any other cameras) could be construed as ‘polling’…for instance ‘looking’ for an SD card or actively ‘looking’ for other device connectivity like a computer? For that matter, does a shutter button press directly ‘wake’ the camera or is the camera polling the shutter button circuitry for input (if there is even a distinction to be made there)? Regardless, what is the typical internal sequence that takes place for the ‘waking’ process to be initiated? I have to assume that it is a similar process to waking up an android phone or tablet but outside of the obvious cause and effect, the subtle underpinnings are unknown to me.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 1, 2016 at 2:31 pm

      Are your test a7RII(s) in Airplane Mode and if not how is your WiFi set up on your cameras?

      Not in airplane mode, but with WiFi off. In previous tests, there weren’t differences between that and Airplane mode, but it’s worth looking at again.

      Jim

      Reply
      • Bruce Oudekerk says

        November 1, 2016 at 5:26 pm

        The only way I know of to turn off WiFi is to go into Airplane Mode Airplane mode. It has the added benefit of also turning off NFC which presumably is doing something periodically.

        Bruce

        Reply
    • Jim says

      November 1, 2016 at 2:33 pm

      …what other functions (in these or any other cameras) could be construed as ‘polling’…for instance ‘looking’ for an SD card or actively ‘looking’ for other device connectivity like a computer? For that matter, does a shutter button press directly ‘wake’ the camera or is the camera polling the shutter button circuitry for input (if there is even a distinction to be made there)? Regardless, what is the typical internal sequence that takes place for the ‘waking’ process to be initiated?

      I have almost no knowledge of the internal systems design of these — or any other — cameras. I can guess, but so can you all. If there are tests you want run, please let me know. Maybe we can do some reverse engineering.

      Jim

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Is IBIS costing you battery life in your Sony a7RII? says:
    November 2, 2016 at 4:48 pm

    […] This is a continuation in a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here. […]

    Reply
  2. Sony a7RII current draw test methodology says:
    November 3, 2016 at 3:41 pm

    […] This is a continuation in a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here. […]

    Reply
  3. Sony a7RII current — EVF, LCD, neither says:
    November 4, 2016 at 3:30 pm

    […] This is a continuation in a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here. […]

    Reply
  4. The joys and difficulties of modern instrumentation says:
    November 5, 2016 at 4:14 pm

    […] This is an aside to a  series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here. […]

    Reply
  5. Sony a7RII battery current when charged through USB port says:
    November 9, 2016 at 2:11 pm

    […] This is a continuation in a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here. […]

    Reply
  6. Sony a7RII battery draw — summary says:
    November 10, 2016 at 8:34 am

    […] This is a continuation in a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here. […]

    Reply
  7. Sony a6300 battery drain dynamics says:
    November 12, 2016 at 10:32 am

    […] This is a coda to a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.