• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / EFCS vs silent shutter vibration

EFCS vs silent shutter vibration

July 19, 2014 JimK 2 Comments

I’ve already established that electronic first curtain shutter can provide sharper tripod-mounted images with the Sony a7 than with the all-mechanical shutter mode on that camera and the all-mechanical shutter on the a7R. I wondered if using the a7S in all-electronic shutter mode — aka silent shutter — would provide any benefits.

I took the longest lens I have that will take a 77mm filter: the Nikon AFS-Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED, and mounted it to the a7S with a Metabones adapter. Using the rotating foot, I clipped the lens, in landscape orientation into an Arca Swiss C1 head which was attached to a set of RRS TVC-44 legs.

I mounted a Heliopan variable ND filter on the lens. I lit an Imatest SFRPlus target with a Fotodiox 5500K variable output LED source. I set the ISO to 400, focused wide open, and set the aperture to f/11. Using the ND filter and the light together to control the, and made a series of exposures of durations from 1/250 second through 1/8 second at 1 stop intervals. I controlled the number of photons hitting the sensor with the ND filter.

Then I did it again.

I processed the images in Lightroom 5.6 with default settings except for cropping and white balance, then I processed them in Imatest, measuring the  MTF50 for horizontal edges. I converted the Imatest cycles/pixel data to cycles/picture height, and made plots.

s vs efcs a7s 80-400 mtf50

s vs efcs a7s 80-400 mtf50b

Noisy results. It looks like the all electronic shutter helps a little, but not much. If I could have performed the testing with a sharper lens, it might have helped more.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a7S silent shutter scanning speed for APS-C images How read and quantizing noise interact →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    July 20, 2014 at 5:37 am

    Hi Jim,

    “…focused wide open, and set the aperture to f/…”

    That was also my procedure up to this week, but after reading the following paper by Dr. Nasse I wonder if we are not shortchanging the system when we do that. The paper infers on page 36 that focusing wide open and then changing aperture substantially may (will in typical photographic lenses) result in a shift of the optimal focus plane as a result of the changed blend in Spherical Aberrations. Perhaps at f/11 in lab conditions it would still be best to focus in liveview (or focus peak) at that aperture?
    http://www.zeiss.com/content/dam/Photography/new/pdf/en/cln_archiv/cln35_en_web_special_bokeh.pdf

    Jack

    Reply
    • Jim says

      July 20, 2014 at 5:15 pm

      Jack, I’ve struggled with this issue for a while. If you can focus a stopped-down lens with great accuracy, I’m sure that you want to focus stopped down. On SLR ground classes that had clear centers with black crosses, I used the move your head technique (if the image doesn’t move wrt the cross, it’s in focus) to great effect of stopped down lenses. I haven’t had such good results with live view, but, as LV gets better, focusing stopped-down probably becomes more attractive.

      Oh, Lord. Something else to test. Thanks, Jack…

      …I think.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.