the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / ETTR — Just crank up the ISO? Part 14

ETTR — Just crank up the ISO? Part 14

February 21, 2013 JimK 1 Comment

I ran the same series of tests that I’ve run on the D4, D800E, and M9 on the Sony RX-1.

I expected to find more signs of self heating of the sensor, since the RX-1 runs with live view on all the time, but I did not. Here’s a series of closely-spaced exposures of 1/4 second at ISO 6400. The subject is total darkness. The dotted green lines are least-squares fits to the green data.

 

And here’s the standard deviation of the series:

 

The noise floor versus ISO test did produce a surprise:

The values for the ISO 100 setting don’t make sense. However, they are repeatable. I  had lens chromatic aberration and falloff correction turned on in the camera.  Maybe that has something to do with it. I may check to satisfy my curiosity, but I can’t see any way this anomaly could affect picture making.

The signal to noise ratio (SNR) plotted as a function of ISO setting at an exposure calculated to give a constant 4000-count average green histogram measured in a 200×200 pixel central sample drops off as (by now) I would expect.

Subtracting out the half a stop per stop falloff from reduced photon count as the ISO goes higher, we get this (the narrow lines indicate plus and minus two standard deviations as calculated from the data from the 16 exposures per data point):

There are very small mid and high value SNR  improvements to be had in increasing the ISO settings of the camera over pushing in Lightroom or ACR. After 800, you might as well push in ACR or LR. Over 1600, you’re actually hurting yourself fractionally by turning up the ISO setting.

In the shadows (green counts of around 500), the SNR plot looks like this:

And, with the half-stop/stop slope subtracted out, it looks like this:

In the shadows, you can’t help yourself much by increasing the ISO setting, but, past 1600, you can do yourself a bit of damage, especially in the red channel.

The Last Word

← ETTR — Just crank up the ISO? Part 13 ETTR — Just crank up the ISO? Part 15 →

Trackbacks

  1. M9 Colors at Night — Best Way to Shoot High ISO? - Seite 7 - Leica User Forum says:
    August 5, 2013 at 6:21 pm

    […] stop getting any advantage in turning up the ISO on the RX1 at ISO 800 or ISO 1600. ETTR — Just crank up the ISO? Part 14 | The Last Word There's some digital gain going on that means that you want to avoid ISO 6400 and above. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Shutter shock and the Nikon Z7
  • John Vickers on Shutter shock and the Nikon Z7
  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.