the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Four macros on the a7RII — overall closeup rendering

Four macros on the a7RII — overall closeup rendering

April 30, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

This is a continuation of testing of  the following macro lenses :

  • Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro
  • Leica 100mm f/2.8 Apo Macro-Elmarit-R
  • Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar ZF
  • Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor G VR

The test starts here:

Focus shift and LoCA in the Leica-R 100/2.8 Apo Macro

I will do some sharpness testing at longer distances eventually. But it’s really labor intensive. Boring. Monotonous. Soporific.

So I’d like to put it off for a while.

Today I’ll show you some examples of how the lenses render a closeup — but not  really macro — scene with a lot of out of focus stuff in the image.

Here’s the scene with the Zeiss 100 wide open:

 

Zeiss f/2
Zeiss f/2

I focused on the nose. All the other pictures are with the camera mounted the same distance from the subject, so the perspective ought to be pretty much the same. The framing is quite different, however, because the lenses have different focal lengths. Not only do they have different focal lengths written on the barrel, two of them, the Sony and the Nikon,  have different focal lengths depending on where they’re focused.

They are all color balanced the same way, so any color differences that you see are due to the lenses themselves.

Here are all four at f/2.8:

Nikon f/2.8
Nikon f/2.8
Sony f/2.8
Sony f/2.8
Leica f/2.8
Leica f/2.8
Zeiss f/2.8
Zeiss f/2.8

You can see that all but the Sony appear to have about the same focal length at this distance. The Sony is much shorter. At infinity, it is the shortest lens in the test, but the difference is more than the 10% from the Leica and the Zeiss that would come from that. The Nikon has gotten about 5% shorter than its infinity focal length. The Sony has gotten shorter than that.

At f/4:

Nikon f/4
Nikon f/4
Sony f/4
Sony f/4
Leica f/4
Leica f/4
Zeiss f/4
Zeiss f/4

At f/5.6:

Nikon f/5.6
Nikon f/5.6
Sony f/5.6
Sony f/5.6
Leica f/5.6
Leica f/5.6
Zeiss f/5.6
Zeiss f/5.6

At f/8:

Nikon f/8
Nikon f/8
Sony f/8
Sony f/8
Leica f/8
Leica f/8
Zeiss f/8
Zeiss f/8

At f/11:

Nikon f/11
Nikon f/11
Sony f/11
Sony f/11
Leica f/11
Leica f/11
Zeiss f/11
Zeiss f/11

I think I’ll let you draw your own conclusions about the rendering.

 

The Last Word

← Macro depth of field and focusing considerations Four macros on the a7RII — overall closeup rendering details →

Comments

  1. Eric says

    May 2, 2016 at 12:15 am

    I see lower microcontrast in Nikon. But bokeh transition is more interesting. The eye in Nikon f/4 seems less blurred compred to Leica at f/4.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      May 2, 2016 at 6:59 am

      The Nikon f-stops are approximate, as it’s a G lens.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Jim Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on X2D and GFX 100S color accuracy with various profiles
  • ZHIHUI GAO on X2D and GFX 100S color accuracy with various profiles
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.