• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji 23 on GFX, Batis 18 on a7RII — distortion

Fuji 23 on GFX, Batis 18 on a7RII — distortion

June 28, 2017 JimK 5 Comments

This is the 61st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. 

In the previous post, I looked at the general rendering of the GFX with the Fuji 23 and the a7RII with the Batis 18. Now I’m going to show you some images designed to get a handle on distortion.

Batis 18

 

Fuji 23

It’s be easier to tell what’s going on if I add some construction lines.

Batis 18

Don’t look at the copper flashing; it’s not perfectly straight. The wooden beams are, though. The batis distortion is minimal unless you’re doing upper-level architectural work. It is of the mustache variety, with the beam appearing to sag as you come in from the sides, and then rising again in the center. The above images have no distortion correction applied; the lens profile correction in Lr is turned off.

Now let’s look at the Fuji 23mm f/4 image with no correction. In order to see it without correction, I converted it to a DNG file with lens corrections set to “Ignore”, and then opened that in Lr.

We don’t need construction lines here. You can see that the Fuji distortion is of the “barrel” type, with the beam appearing to rise slightly in the middle, and there is much less of it.

Turning on Lr’s lens profile correction tames the distortion quite a bit:

 

Fuji 23

 

If we turn on lens profile correction for the Batis, here’s what we see:

The moustache distortion is gone.

It’s interesting to look at the Fuji corrected and uncorrected images superimposed:

Let’s zero in on that upper right corner:

That’s interesting. The field of view (FOV) is wider in the corrected image than it is in the uncorrected one. That means that there must be extra pixels not normally visible that the camera provides for use in distortion correction.

Left eye, a DPR contributor, provides the following insights on the way the GFX and Lr/ACr work together to do lens distortion correction:

The GFX corrects for distortion live-in-camera, so the view in the EVF and LCD are corrected in real-time. This affects the JPEG preview image and recorded JPEG images, but not the raw data itself. Correction hints to the raw processor are incorporated in the metadata.

ACR / LR ‘honors’ the GFX’s approach and also automatically applies the correction – to match what you saw when framing through the GFX EVF/LCD. This automatic correction cannot be turned off in ACR / LR (and can’t be turned on, as it’s already on, and fixed on).

The necessary correction data is passed within the .raf file to ACR / LR for the correction – it makes no difference if the lens has only just been released. ACR / LR doesn’t need it’s own distortion profile for these lenses, it’s given in the file’s metadata – which in any case is the best approach (not having to wait for an app to support a lens).

This is different from the way that Sony does lens distortion correction; it counts on the lens profile in Lr/ACR to do the work. You can turn that on and off in Lr, and the default is off. Iridient Developer and Iridient XTransformer allow you to defeat the Fuji lens corrections if you wish to do so.

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fuji 23 on GFX, Batis 18 on a7RII — kickoff Zeiss Batis 18/2.8 IR hotspotting →

Comments

  1. Bill Reicher says

    June 28, 2017 at 4:58 pm

    Waay too much distortion from the Fuji lens. At $2600 I would expect much better performance.

    I bought the GFX with some lenses but returned it due to unsatisfactory handling and other issues. Seeing images like this makes me glad I didnt keep such an expensive camera.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 28, 2017 at 6:22 pm

      Don’t know what you mean. These are impressive images to me. You read the part about how to view the images in the previous post, right? Maybe I need to make that more clear. When Lr gets the lens correction profiles installed, the distortion will be considerably reduced, I’m sure.

      Reply
  2. ChrisW says

    June 29, 2017 at 8:37 am

    Fuji has it’s lenscorrection in the meta data, so lightroom does it automatically. There is an little i that, when you hover over it, tells you what it corrects.

    Reply
  3. Mark Kay says

    June 29, 2017 at 8:41 am

    Jim Thanks for the last two comparisons between these two lenses. I have the Fuji 23mm on order and am impressed by your results. Nice and sharp and little falloff in the corners. I hope Lr makes an adjustment to remove the barrel distortion. It does a good job with the Batis. Will stick with the Leica WATE for the wide end on the Sony for now.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S Roundup | Fuji Addict says:
    June 29, 2017 at 9:52 am

    […] The Last Word – Fuji 23 on GFX, Batis 18 on a7RII — distortion […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.