• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji 32-64/4 LoCA

Fuji 32-64/4 LoCA

August 6, 2017 JimK 3 Comments

This is the third post in a series of tests of the Fujifilm 32-64 mm f/4 lens on the Fuji GFX 50S. The test starts here.

In order to test on-axis longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA), I use computer controlled focusing rail and a razor blade target.

A quick review of the test protocol:

  • Fuji GFX 50S
  • ISO 100
  • Manual exposure
  • Wescott LED panels set to 5500 K.
  • EFCS shutter mode
  • Manual focus, set at one position in the center of the rail for f/4
  • Cognisys computer-driven focusing rail
  • 101 exposures 1.6 mm  apart
  • Target distance at the center of the rail, 1.6 m
  • RAF mosaiced files converted to DNG in Adobe DNG Converter
  • DNGs extracted as TIFFs in dcraw (document mode)
  • TIFFs cropped and raw channels selected in Matlab program
  • MTF50 of cropped TIFFs measured with MTF Mapper
  • Data assembled in Matlab
  • Data plotted in Excel

Here are the results wide open at 64 mm:

The vertical axis is MTF50, measured in cycles per picture height (cy/ph). The horizontal axis is camera position shift in cm. The points on the left side of the graph are with the camera farther away from the subject than the points on the right. 

There is essentially zero LoCA: the peaks are at the same distance for all three channels. However, the unnatural (if you’re new to this presentation of LoCA, trust me; it is unusual) flatness of the top of the curve indicates that lens aberrations are limiting sharpness considerably at f/4 and this subject distance. 

You can see that at 64mm, the red channel is the sharpest, followed by the green, then the blue. You can also see a little bit of LoCA: the peaks of all three channels don’t occur at the same distance. By the width of the peaks, you can see the depth of field (DOF) at this distance is nearly sufficient to mask all the LoCA.

At 44mm:

Now the red channel is the weakest, but not by much. The LoCA is still fairly low.

At 32 mm:

At 32 mm, there is a lot of LoCA. If the blue channel is in focus at 3000 cy/ph, the red channel can only resolve half that. If the red channel is in focus at 2600 or 2700 cy.ph, the blue channel can only resolve half that.

64 mm at f/5.6:

This is amazing! There is no LoCA at all.

44mm at f/5.6:

Essentially no LoCA as well. How about 32 mm:

There’s quite a bit of LoCA, but there’s also quite a bit of DOF, so the lens should be OK here.

Now we’ll look at f/8:

No problem.

Also excellent.

Enough DOF to cover up the LoCA.

F/11 is as far down as I went:

 

 

All those are fine. With the exception of 32 mm at f/4 and f/5.6, this is an outstanding LoCA performance for any lens, let alone a zoom.

With a complex lens design like this, the performance could vary at other distances. Unfortunately, I can’t test distances well away from the ones I used here.

 

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Discovering the Fujifilm GFX 50S microlens size Fuji 32-64/4 focus shift and parfocality →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    August 6, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    That’s outstanding work Jim, especially given the number of captures involved.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 6, 2017 at 1:20 pm

      Thanks, Jack. Since Frans upgraded MTF Mapper to deal better with OOF images, it’s actually been pretty painless. Still, 1200 captures is a lot.

      Jim

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fuji 32-64/4 focus shift and parfocality says:
    May 8, 2018 at 7:26 am

    […] data in the previous post can be reworked to show focus shift as the lens is stopped […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.