• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji GFX EFCS and electronic shutter effect on bokeh

Fuji GFX EFCS and electronic shutter effect on bokeh

April 4, 2017 JimK 6 Comments

This is the 26th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

On some cameras with electronic first-curtain shutters (EFCS) and non-global all-electronic shutters, there is a difference in the quality of the bokeh between those shutter modes and the all-mechanical shutter.

Is that the case with the GFX?

I set out to find out. I set up the Fuji 120 mm f/4 native macro lens on the GFX, aimed it at a small LED light about 25 feet away, opened the lens up all the way, and defocused severely. Here is the result with the mechanical shutter and with EFCS with the LED in the middle of the frame, with only the central 1/9th of the frame shown, and the shutter set to 1/500 second:

All-mechanical shutter

 

EFCS

I can see no difference. But these effects are often a function of ray angle, since the root of the issue is that oblique rays can get under the mechanical focal plane shutter, but not the electronic ones. I would expect this effect to be greater in the GFX than is come other cameras, because the sensor protective glass is further away from the senor itself than in most cameras.

In the top of the frame:

All-mechanical shutter

 

EFCS

 

Looks fine to me.

In the bottom of the frame, with an all-electronic shutter image thrown in:

All-mechanical shutter

 

EFCS

 

All-electronic shutter

Ignore the horizontal line in the top image; that comes from time modulation of the LED by the light’s controller. Also ignore the colored stripes in the bottom image; they are an artifact of that same modulation and the slow sweep time of the all-electronic shutter.

They all look the same to me.

You are looking at the defocus blur circle of the lens. In an actual photograph, the OOF areas are the sum of those blur circles from all of the OOF parts of the scene. So the fact that none of those blur circles changes means that the bokeh of the image doesn’t change with shutter speed.

If anyone has evidence to the contrary, I’d love to know about it.

I note in passing that these are very pretty blur circles, without a trace of onion ring effects.

I intended to show the effect on bokeh of a leaf shutter, but I ran into a problem. When I mount a Hasselblad HC lens on the Fuji adapter and program the camera to use the leaf shutter, not only does the shutter never close, but the camera displays a message telling me to power-cycle the camera. This has happened with several lenses, all of which are on Fuji’s compatibility list. I suspect that I’ll need to update all the lens firmware.

 

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fujifilm GFX-50S electronic shutter speed Is the GFX an all-rounder? →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    April 5, 2017 at 12:07 am

    ‘No onion rings’ in out of focus PSFs. Is this lens apodized?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 5, 2017 at 7:01 am

      No. You can see that in the “flat” OOF PSF. An apodized lens would have a “haystack” OOF PSF.

      Reply
  2. Dmtiry Anisimov says

    April 5, 2017 at 2:38 am

    I’ve observed very noticeable effect with 50/1.8 lens on NEX-5N at 1/4000 s.
    Heck, it is even possible to use this effect as a form of PDAF (I started a thread on dpreview about it), probably wouldn’t be effective unless shutter updated to work with it.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 5, 2017 at 7:03 am

      Yes. That effect iq quite noticeable if you look for it on all a7x, a6xxx, and NEX-x cameras with EFCS; at least all I’ve tested. One thing the GFX does to mitigate it is turn off EFCS at high shutter speeds.

      Reply
  3. Javier Sanchez says

    June 26, 2024 at 10:02 am

    So in scenarios where we are shooting subjects in front of an LED wall or other LED based source, is it safe to say our best bet is to stick to EFCS?

    I’m also going to have to test this now on my Nikon Z cameras that don’t have a mechanical shutter at all.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 26, 2024 at 10:10 am

      Fully electronic shutters don’t have this bokeh issue.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.