the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Is the GFX an all-rounder?

Is the GFX an all-rounder?

April 5, 2017 JimK 3 Comments

From the mailbag:

Been reading your experiments with the Fuji with fascination. I’ve been looking for a camera to supplement my Leica Q. Just can’t see spending $2k upgrading my Oly OMD for the new one. I always like traveling light but the Fuji and the Hasselblad got my attention. The question I have for you is, do you love yours. Will you be using it all the time? When you travel or want to travel light, will you use it or grab your Sony? Also, you plan to test the Hasselblad, and if not, why do you prefer the Fuji?

 

It’s early days, but I can say with assurance that I will not be using be using the GFX all the time. It’s a bigger, heavier system than an a7x, so not as suited for travel. It’s nowhere near as fast and fluid as a D5, so not as good for events, and particularly sports. The native lens line is quite limited at present, and many situations demand autofocus, which is not available with adapted lenses. 

I have no plans to test the X1D. The lack of a focal plane shutter means that about the only lenses that it’s practical to adapt are the heavy, bulky H-series lenses, and my testing of those lenses with the GFX indicates that they can barely keep up with the sensor when opened up. Also, to this date, auto focus is not available with those lenses, although Hasselblad says they’ll have that RSN. The X1D is swelt, and I think the H-series lenses are a size and weight mismatch. I also have concerns about Hasselblad’s management of their development process; the huge gap between promised and actual deliveries of the X1D and some other recent ‘blads gives me pause.

I don’t like minimalist cameras like the X1D. I prefer LCD screens on top, lots of buttons, dials on top of the camera, multi-function controls, and aperture controls on the lens where God intended them to be (though I’m beginning to bend on that last point). The Fuji interface was totally foreign to me a couple of weeks ago, coming mostly from Nikons and Sonys. However, the more I use it and figure it out, the better I like it. There is a logical consistency to it that is missing entirely from the a7x, and not as well executed in the Nikons. I wish it had more mode buttons that work with the front and back wheels, like the D5. 

You presumably like the Q, so you probably would like the X1D user interface. If you can get your head around the limited native lens selection and trust hasselblad to keep developing and supporting the X camera line, then it could be a good camera for you.

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fuji GFX EFCS and electronic shutter effect on bokeh Fujifilm GFX read noise and EDR →

Comments

  1. steve dworman says

    April 5, 2017 at 12:08 pm

    Thanks so much Jim. There’s a lot to consider in your comment. I think I will pause, hopefully, briefly to see Sony’s predicted upcoming announcements on a potential A7R3.

    Two big pauses I have on Sony though, first, I owned the RX1r, which I liked, but in the three years I owned it, not one firmware upgrade to the camera. Like they shipped and forgot about us.

    And as you said, the button and manual controls on the Leica are wonderful. Hate the menu system with the Sony.

    But I want light and fast so much to think about.

    Thanks so much for all your fun experimenting on this. Kinda of amazing from a non-tech photographer and so much appreciated.

    Best, Steve

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 5, 2017 at 12:26 pm

      And as you said, the button and manual controls on the Leica are wonderful.

      I didn’t mean to say they were wonderful. (I’ve never used them.) I meant to say they were minimalist. Not a minimalist as the TL, though.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S Roundup | Fuji Addict says:
    April 6, 2017 at 11:14 pm

    […] The Last Word – Is the GFX an all-rounder? […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.