• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 MF accuracy

Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 MF accuracy

April 16, 2017 JimK 4 Comments

This is the 34th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

In the previous post, I found some anomalous behavior with the Fujifilm GFX 50S autofocusing with the 120 mm f/4 native macro lens at f/5.6. There have been Internet discussions that say that there’s something strange about the GFX manual focus, too. I decided to do the same kind of test that I did in the previous post (only with a  lot fewer images) to see what happened at f/5.6, and to look for odd behavior.

First off, let’s talk about the GFX manual focusing. There are three magnifications available in addition to full screen, selectable via a thumbwheel that is part of the default control to turn magnified view off and on. As far as I’m concerned, only the most magnified view is useful for critical focusing, and I’d really like more magnification than that. In addition, focus peaking is available, in two levels and three colors. The lowest level is very useful in the field. The highest level just lights up the screen all the time. In fact, for sharp lenses, high-contrast subjects, and good light, the lowest level is often too sensitive. Peaking in the GFX, as in most cameras, is mostly useful in conjunction with magnified view. Full frame peaking is too much of a blunt instrument to be of much use except for DOF assessment. 

I set up my target, with a zone plate that I like to use for focusing:

Rather than tilt the target to get the slanted edge to the right orientation, I just cranked a little roll into the camera. The zone ploate turned out to be too high contrast for best focusing, but I used it anyway. I set the peaking to low, and the color to red. 

I focused at the taking aperture. I have programmed the button on the front of the GFX where the DOF preview is on an SLR to act kind of like that button. Press it once to stop down, and again to open up. There is a little picture of an iris diaphragm that appears in  the finder when the lens is stopped down (but not in magnified view) so you don’t get confused as to whether the lens is open or stopped down. At each whole aperture from f/4 through f/11, I focused and made three exposures, then did that again. I developed the iamges in Lightroom with default settings except for white balance. Lighting was the same as in the two immediately previous posts. I’ll give particulars about the setup at  the end of this one.

As an aside, it’s a lot easier to focus this lens if you turn on the OSS function. I forgot to turn it off before making the exposures once, and it didn’t seem to hurt the results, but I haven’t included that data here.

Here are the average of the six exposures at each stop, and the better of the average of the three exposures at each stop that were the sharpest.

There is not a lot of difference between the average and the best shot at each aperture. Probably I should have done more shots each time I focused, but this is definitely a an experimenter that is hard on the experimenter. If I’d had a lower-contrast target, it would have been a lot easier. 

How’d I do against the auto focus? Whenever I do this comparison with cameras that either focus using contrast detection or tweak the focus that way, it’s usually a humbling experience.

In this case, the autofocus bested me quite convincingly wide open, but I trounced it at f/5.6. Let’s call f/8 and f/11 a draw.

So there’s definitely something strange about the GFX autofocus with this lens at f/5.6. And it appears that there’s no weirdness in the manual focusing of the GFX, at least with this lens. 

 

Here are the test conditions:

  • ISO 100.
  • 5000K illumination, bright enough so that the f/2.8 exposure was 1/320 second
  • Target distance 3 meters
  • EFCS on
  • Lens set to C mode, and aperture controlled from the camera
  • Shutter set to A mode.
  • + 2/3 stop exposure compensation
  • Internal self timer at 2 seconds
  • RRS heavy-duty legs
  • Arca-Swiss C1 head

Until Fuji fixes the f/5.6 issue, the take home lesson for critically focusing this lens is: if you must use f/5.6, focus manually. Note that in many, and probably the vast preponderance, of photographic situations where you’d want to use AF, the small loss in sharpness of the Fuji AF system would go completely  unnoticed.

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 AF accuracy Fujifilm GFX with 63/2.8 MF accuracy →

Comments

  1. George Barr says

    April 16, 2017 at 6:43 pm

    Thank you for all the work you are doing. Hopefully it leads to Fuji taking action on the problem. Despite Didlloyd concerns about manual focus, your results suggest that manual focus is in fact reliable, given your use of low level peaking combined with the highest magnification focusing. It would be nice if Fuji would arrange that focus peaking only applies to the magnified view and not the regular.

    Reply
    • Ahmed Gencal says

      April 16, 2017 at 9:12 pm

      But here manual focus has been made in some kind of stop down mode.I mean the focus has done in the desired shooting aperture.Diglloyd didn’t do that.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S AF Issue and April 19th Announcement Update | Fuji Addict says:
    April 17, 2017 at 10:50 pm

    […] The Last Word – Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 MF accuracy […]

    Reply
  2. Fujifilm GFX 50S focusing — summary to date says:
    April 19, 2017 at 8:34 pm

    […] The best strategy for manually focusing the 63 mm f/2.8 lens is to focus wide open. That doesn’t work with the 120. The best way to deal with the 120 macro is to focus at taking aperture, or maybe slightly open from … […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.