the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Improving the museum experience — non-technical considerations

Improving the museum experience — non-technical considerations

February 2, 2008 JimK Leave a Comment

The unpleasant aspects of the museum-going experience are pretty obvious: dealing with bad weather, traffic jams, parking, standing in line, trying to get an unobstructed view through crowds, having your feet stepped on, having the guards tell you not to get so close, backache from bending over to read descriptions three feet off the floor, and questionable-but-expensive food. What’s good about going to museum? Or, asked in a way pertinent to the subject of this post, if high quality books and magazines are available, what will be the reasons to go to museums?

To be in the presence of the object. Some people place great store in observing the actual physical object created by the artist. This probably is more important if the objects are singular, as is the case with painting and some sculptures, rather than if the objects are one of a set, as is the case with photographs, etchings, woodcuts, cast sculptures, etc. it’s hard to imagine people placing great stock in viewing the original image if the objects are produced by a purely mechanical process such as ink jet printing.

To enjoy the environment. At some museums, the architecture is as big a draw as what’s on the walls. It is exhilarating to be a in an inspired and inspiring space, especially if it’s not crowded.

To see large images. Images in books are limited in their size. You can observe the book from a closer distance than an image on the wall of a museum, which compensates on a purely optical measure. However, there is something striking about being in the presence of a large object.

To participate in social interaction. Openings, parties, and walk-around lectures enrich people’s lives.

To be educated. To the lectures mentioned above, add docent-led tours, seminars, and artists talking about their work.

To save money, if the comparison is buying a book. One or two visits to a museum will be cheaper than purchasing a high quality art book, if you don’t consider travel and lodging. In addition, visiting a museum will allow a greater variety of images to be viewed that could be presented in a book. However, the fair comparison is between a museum going experience and going to a facility, say a library, and viewing the works in a book.

Of these reasons, only the first one is affected negatively by the decision to exhibit a copy rather than an original photograph. So, from a social and psychological perspective, the hard-to-pin-down human desire for eyeball-to-object contact with an original work of art is the only remaining reason to forgo the better appreciation of the work that would be available from a well-lit copy.

There is one legal impediment to exhibiting copies. Owning the physical image doesn’t mean that you own the right to reproduce that image. Unless otherwise specified, the photographer almost always retains that right. Usually, artists give up the rights to reproduce images for catalogs and advertisements, but not for exhibition. So, even though the photographers would benefit from having their work displayed to better aesthetic advantage, museums would have to convince each one individually of this. In the case of dead photographers, museums would have to find and convince whoever owns the rights, and that may not be such an easy sell.

One way for museums to get started with exhibiting copies might be for them to show the reproductions in addition to, rather than instead of, the originals. Say there’s an important, beautiful, small, old, rare, unstable print that a museum wants to show the public. They could go ahead and show it as usual, under glass, lit with yellowish light with the intensity of two candles. At the same time, nearby they could show a large (but not so large that the size won’t support the level of detail present in the original) well-lit high-quality reproduction of the same work, and pay attention to how many people go to each print, how long they stay, and what they have to say about the two experiences.

Even that small step will require a change in the way that most curators look at the world. I’m not holding my breath.

The Last Word

← Technical issues in improving the museum experience When good pictures turn bad →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.