• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / IR hotspotting with the 35mm f/2 Distagon ZF.2

IR hotspotting with the 35mm f/2 Distagon ZF.2

March 22, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

In yesterday’s post, there were some indications of hotspotting with the Zeiss ZF.2 35mm lens. I did a test for that today. In visible light, when I look for non-uniformity in field illumination, I use an Expodisc. I was worried that that technique might induce some artifact that I don’t understand. The sky was overcast this morning, so I just shot an aperture series of the low clouds.

f/2
f/2

A lot of corner falloff,  just as in visible light, but no hot spot.

f/2.8
f/2.8

Less corner falloff. Is that a hot spot developing, or is that just the clouds? It’s in the wrong place to be a hot spot, unless the lens is decentered.

f/4
f/4

It’s not getting worse. I guess it was just the clouds.

f/5.6
f/5.6

We’re still losing the edge falloff.

f/8
f/8

Looking good.

f/11
f/11

Now, just maybe, we’re getting the beginnings of a real hot spot, although it’s not bad enough to harm the image.

f/16
f/16

OK. There it is.

f/22
f/22

Pretty bad at f/22, but I’d never use that aperture.

I repeated the series with an Expodisc.

f/2
f/2
f/2.8
f/2.8
f/4
f/4
f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11

Just the beginning of a hot spot.

f/16
f/16

Now we have an obvious hot spot

f/22
f/22

Even worse.

If the Expodisc is a reasonable test, You can use f/11 in a pinch, but don’t go beyond that with the LifePixel standard IR filter.

 

The Last Word

← 3 WA lenses on the a7II in IR Measuring IR hot spots →

Comments

  1. Herb says

    March 23, 2015 at 7:37 am

    Jim, I had lifepixel convert my A7R to standard IR and check it out with the Zony 35mm lens. They reported hot spot problems, but only at very small apertures. I have had no problems with it up to and including f11, although most of my shots are f8 and less.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.