the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Measuring IR hot spots

Measuring IR hot spots

March 24, 2015 JimK 3 Comments

There is an opinion that the hot spots that you sometimes see when lenses not intended for use in the infrared are used there is the result of lens flare. In other words, the light that causes the hot spot is not light from parts of the scene close to the center of the image, but rather light from disparate parts of the scene are concentrated in the center of the image.

When I tested the Zeiss 35mm f/2 Distagon ZF.2 a couple of days ago, it looked like it had some hot spotting at f/11 and narrower f-stops. I wanted to look more closely at that, and also to test whether the hotspots seemed to have the characteristics of concentrated flare.

I cut up a mostly-dark photograph and taped it to a window. Then i made an aperture series.

 

f/2
f/2
f.2,8
f.2,8
f/4
f/4
f/5.6
f/5.6

 

f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11
f/16
f/16
f/22
f/22

It’s hard to see, but the central part of the image does get brighter and brighter, starting a f-stops wider than were indicated a causing hot spots in the Expodisc test that I used in the last post. By the way, ignore the two white rings in the upper right of the square. They’re from the photo that I cut off for this test. I thought that the interior/exterior lighting level difference would make them invisible, but I was wrong.

To see if the effect was any different with a smaller occlusion, stuck a Post-it note on the window and made another aperture series.

 

f/2
f/2
f/2.8
f/2.8
f/4
f/4
f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11
f/16
f/16
f/22
f/22

The same thing happens. To quantify this, I measured the central value in Lightroom for all the images, and plotted the results.

 

cebtrol hot spot birghtness

It looks like there is evidence of hot spotting starting at f/5.6. But is the hot spotting enough to be visible in photographs? I took down the Post-it note and made another aperture series.

f/2
f/2
f/2.8
f/2.8
f/4
f/4
f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11
f/16
f/16
f/22
f/22

I can see it plainly in the last one. I can see it somewhat at f/16. I wouldn’t notice it at f/11 unless I were looking for it.

The good news is: we now have in the occluded middle test, a very sensitive quantitative indicator of the presence and severity of hot spots.

The bad news is: the test may be so sensitive that it might cause us to reject perfectly good lenses and/or useful f-stops.

Doing a similar test with the 28mm f/1.4 Nikkor-D yields this:

occluded ctr 28mm Nik

Note that the general shape of the curve is the same, but that the values are much lower. It may be that the lenses that don’t show hot spots at narrow apertures have lower central flare at all apertures.

 

 

The Last Word

← IR hotspotting with the 35mm f/2 Distagon ZF.2 Options for travel photography →

Comments

  1. Herb says

    March 25, 2015 at 8:14 am

    Jim, great work-you are a real treasure. I have been a devotee of IR from back in my LF days, when I never ran into hot spots on Rollei IR film- could that be a digital only occurrence?
    FYI, I have a gallery winner that has a big hot spot in the middle, everybody thinks it is the sun.

    Reply
  2. Bob Estremera says

    November 24, 2022 at 11:40 am

    Thanks for this info. I’m about to get back my IR converted (720) Fuji XM1 and will be testing some of my lenses for hotspots. Does it matter which direction the sun is coming from or will a lens with hotspots show them regardless of sun direction?
    Thanks, Bob

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 24, 2022 at 11:46 am

      Sun direction is not much of a factor in hotspot visibility. If the sun is in the middle of the frame, you may not see a hot spot, but that’s not a common occurrence.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.