the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Is the Otus diffraction limited?

Is the Otus diffraction limited?

May 14, 2014 By JimK Leave a Comment

With a lens this good, the real question is. “At what f-stops is the lens diffraction-limited.?” I thought I’d try to find out. The motivation is to get some insight into how close real photographic lenses are to being diffraction-limited, and thus learn whether or not the concept of Imaging System Q, which I’ve been talking about in the last few posts, applies to normal photography, and not just aerial and orbiting cameras.

I mounted the Zeiss 55mm f/1.4 Distagon ZF.2 (hereafter called the Otus) to the Sony alpha 7R. I mounted a RRS L-plate, clipped it in landscape orientation into an Arca Swiss C1 head which was attached to a set of RRS TVC-44 legs.

I lit an Imatest SFRPlus target with a Paul Buff Einstein strobe. I set the ISO to 100, the shutter speed to 1/10 second, programmed second curtain synch to deal with any shutter vibrations, focused wide open, and set the aperture to f/11. Using the variable power output on the Einstein to control the light level, I made a series of ten exposures each at f/11, f/8, f/5.6, f/4, and f/2.8. I developed the images in Lightroom 5.4 with sharpening and noise reduction turned off, exported them as TIFFs, and measured on-axis MTF50 and MTF30.

Here’s what I got, including confidence lines two standard deviations above and below the averages:

a7reotusfseries

Well, we know that the Otus’ best f-stop for on-axis performance is f/5.6, and that it doesn’t fall off very fast on both sides of that. But what do we know about where it’s diffraction-limited? Not much.

I turned to my camera simulator, and programmed it to model a camera with the same pixel pitch as the a7R (and, as it happens, as the Nikon D800E), no AA filter, and 550 nm illumination. I analyzed the simulated images with Imatest, and here are the results plotted on the same graph as the a7R/Otus results:

diffvsOtus

It looks like the combination is essentially diffraction-limited at f/11 (and presumably f/16), and pretty close to that at f/8.

So the idea of using Imaging System Q on normal (well, very good) cameras and lenses isn’t so far-fetched.

There’s another lesson here. Notice that the MTF keeps going up as the perfect lens is opened up. Sure, a 4.77 micrometer pixel pitch isn’t enough to get anywhere near what the ideal lens can deliver at those wide openings, but it still helps to have a sharper image falling on the sensor.

It’s the flip side of what we saw when we were investigating the benefits of higher sensel density. It helps, and it continues to help past the point where the sensor’s contribution to the MTF falloff is not as important as the lens’s.

More to come.

← The effect of Q on false color and aliasing Aliasing with the Otus →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2021
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Robert Frangioso on Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt R on GFX 50R in infrared
  • Robert Frangioso on Why so few posts?
  • Ken on Noise reduction and downsampling
  • Robert Kuechle on Chronography video up
  • JimK on Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S
  • DanB on Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S
  • gideon on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • JimK on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • Gideon on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • JimK on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.