• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron-M

Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron-M

July 26, 2015 JimK 4 Comments

This is part 8 in a series of posts on a prototype of the Kolari Vision thin-stack sensor modification for the Sony a7II. The series starts here.

The Leica 90mm f/2 Apo-Summicron-M  ASPH is a great performer on the Sony a7x cameras. Its exit pupil is far enough from the sensor plane that the corners are generally sharp. How is it on the Kolari-modified a7II?

The scene, at f/2, with both a stock and a Kolari-modified a7II:

Standard
Standard
Kolari
Kolari

Same color shift we saw in the earlier pictures.

In the lower left corner, wide open and stopping down at whole apertures, enlarged 3:1, processed in Lightroom with daylight white balance and otherwise default settings:

 

Standard f/2
Standard f/2
Kolari f/2 center focused
Kolari f/2

Both sensors are doing a good job.

Standard f/2.8
Standard f/2.8
Kolari f/2.8 center focused
Kolari f/2.8

The Kolari is slightly sharper, probably the result of its lack of an AA filter.

Standard f/4
Standard f/4
Kolari f/4
Kolari f/4

Again. the Kolari is slightly sharper, probably the result of its lack of an AA filter.

Bored yet? I can tell you that the difference between the modified and standard sensor images as the lens is stopped down to f/16 remains the same. The Kolari mod doesn’t hurt anything with this lens, and helps a bit in this test — which has no obvious aliasing — because it omits the AA filter.

The f/16 images, showing a lot of diffraction, but still looking darned good:

Standard f/16
Standard f/16
Kolari f/16
Kolari f/16

A can’t resist emphasizing what a nice lens the 90 ‘cron Apo is on the a7II. I should also mention how difficult is is to get critical focus wide open with so little DOF available. I had to do focus bracketing to get this series.

The Last Word

← Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica 24/2.8 Elmarit-M Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica WATE at 16mm →

Comments

  1. Chris Livsey says

    July 27, 2015 at 1:27 pm

    “I should also mention how difficult is is to get critical focus wide open with so little DOF available. I had to do focus bracketing to get this series.”

    Is the focus peaking not effective with this combination? ( I have no experience with that system so my question is in ignorance of its advantages and limitations)

    Supplementary:
    Would deconvolution sharpening of the AA filter version match the AA free version. (I know from a testing aspect no tampering is required but in real life would that even out the final image quality?

    No, not bored… yet.

    Reply
  2. Michael Demeyer says

    July 28, 2015 at 10:35 pm

    Hi Jim,

    Looking forward to your test results on the image stabilization after the modification. I have the original A7 modified and have been very pleased with the performance – completely consistent with your results so far.

    Michael

    Reply
  3. Lynn Allan says

    July 29, 2015 at 5:43 pm

    Interesting series of articles … rather esoteric, but that seems to be a specialty of yours.

    My impression is that the conversion would appeal to a person with one or several very high end wide angle legacy lenses (Leica / Zeiss / etc.) from the film days to get the most performance from the lens(es).

    BTW: my understanding is that you have two of the a7Rii on pre-order. Do you anticipate eventually converting one to the “thin stack” and/or a conversion to IR?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      July 29, 2015 at 8:34 pm

      IR.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.