• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica WATE at 16mm

Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica WATE at 16mm

July 29, 2015 JimK 3 Comments

This is part 9 in a series of posts on a prototype of the Kolari Vision thin-stack sensor modification for the Sony a7II. The series starts here.

The Leica 16-18-21mm f/4 Tri-Elmar (WATE)  is an excellent performer on the Sony a7x cameras. considering that it’s a zoom lens. Its exit pupil is far enough from the sensor plane that the corners are generally sharp. How is it on the Kolari-modified a7II?

The scene wide open at f/4 and 16mm with both the standard and thin-stack cameras. I focused on the lower left corner:

Standard
Standard
Kolari
Kolari

Same color shift we saw in the earlier pictures.

In the lower left corner, wide open and stopping down at whole apertures, enlarged 3:1, processed in Lightroom with daylight white balance, a one-stop boost to compensate for lens falloff, and otherwise default settings:

Standard f/4
Standard f/4
Kolari f/4
Kolari f/4

Pretty similar, with the nod going to the thin-stack sensor. This is good performance for a zoom lens.

Standard f/5.6
Standard f/5.6
Kolari f/5,6
Kolari f/5,6

The Kolari is definitely better. In both cases, this is exceptional performance for a zoom lens.

Standard f/8
Standard f/8
Kolari f/8
Kolari f/8

Both are very good. The best f-stop for both in the corners.

Standard f/11
Standard f/11
Kolari f/11
Kolari f/11

Also both very good, with the Kolari ahead by a nose, probably because of the lack of an AA filter. Diffraction is beginning to set in.

Standard f/16
Standard f/16
Kolari f/16
Kolari f/16

Diffraction is damaging both images, with the Kolari ahead.

Standard f/22
Standard f/22
Kolari f/22
Kolari f/22

Serious diffraction blur here.

 

 

The Last Word

← Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron-M Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica WATE at 21mm →

Comments

  1. Rick says

    August 2, 2015 at 2:36 pm

    Why not just shoot it on the M where you don’t have to worry about corner smearing and color shift? I must be missing the point here.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 2, 2015 at 6:00 pm

      Tests on the M240 are coming. Soon, I hope. I shot the images this afternoon.

      Jim

      Reply
    • Jim says

      August 3, 2015 at 1:16 pm

      I’ve finished the WATE testing on the Kolari-modded a7II and the M240, and there’s not a material difference between the way to two cameras do with the lens. So, to answer your question about why you’d want to use the WATE on the Kolari a7II rather than the M240, I think there are several possible reasons:

      Better EVF resolution, integrated EVF
      More dynamic range
      No green shadows
      Smaller, lighter
      Cheaper
      EFCS (although that won’t make any difference with the WATE)

      The reasons to use the M240 might go something like this:

      Rangefinder
      Battery life
      Don’t need an adapter

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.