the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Lightroom performance improvements?

Lightroom performance improvements?

July 11, 2017 JimK 3 Comments

I recently saw this:

On Lightroom Performance

Looks like the folks at Adobe are now recognizing the depths to which Lr performance has sunk. This is good news and bad news. The good news is that it looks like they’re going to make some improvements. The bad news is that they aren’t currently working on a performance boosting project, but are in the deciding what to do about it phase.

Nevertheless, I encourage you to click no the link above and take the survey.

 

The Last Word

← Sony 12-24 LoCA & focus shift at 18 & 24 mm Sony 12-24/4 AF performance with a7RII →

Comments

  1. Matt O'Brien says

    July 12, 2017 at 5:15 am

    I agree completely.

    Also, if they are serious, I do not understand why they limit the survey to such a small subset of users.

    The paragraph seems to be very poorly crafted, open to criticism and ridicule on many of the points raised.

    Reply
    • Edna Bambrick says

      July 12, 2017 at 4:46 pm

      Because Adobe don’t give a flying f.

      Reply
  2. David Braddon-Mitchell says

    July 12, 2017 at 7:59 pm

    They do say that they know a lot of the pain points and have sunk a lot of resources into them; so perhaps there’s a first tranche of performance improvements on the way. I really hope so. I just don’t want to have to learn to be fluent in Capture One…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2023
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Olaf on Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms
  • JimK on Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms
  • Paul on A book report: decisions, decisions
  • Olaf on Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms
  • JimK on Sigma ART 50/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S
  • Simon on Sigma ART 50/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S
  • Bob Foster on Hasselblad X2D firmware 2.0
  • JimK on UniWB on the X2D
  • Ad Dieleman on UniWB on the X2D
  • Christer Almqvist on Specularity, part 2

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.