the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Macbeth testing with auto-exposure

Macbeth testing with auto-exposure

February 2, 2016 By JimK Leave a Comment

This is the 31st in a series of posts on color reproduction. The series starts here.

We have seen that, with nonlinear profiles, Macbeth color accuracy can be affected by exposure. The purpose of this post is to explore the utility of the automatic exposure systems that are built into modern cameras as a tool to minimize these variations.

I took a Sony a7RII, and set it in aperture mode so that it would vary the exposure as I varied the light level. The lens was the Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE macro. The lighting was two Westcott LED panels on full, with the color temperature set to 5000K. I made 11 exposures. The first exposure was with the light intensity set to 100, then 95, then 90, then 85, then 80, and so on, all the way to 50, for roughly 1 stop of dynamic range in tenth-stop intervals. The intervals are actually linear, not logarithmic, but that’s not important for this test.

The simulated reference was lit with D50 light. I developed in Lr with the distinctly nonlinear Adobe Standard profile, and all controls at their default settings except that I white balanced to the third gray patch from the left. I computed the mean and standard deviation (sigma) of a bunch of aggregate color measures.

Here are the resulting statistics:

50-100 ASP A mode stats

These results are incredibly precise, with standard deviations (sigmas) two orders of magnitude below the means. It makes me think that the a7RII, although it reports shutter speed in 1/3 stop intervals when it’s in A mode, actually adjusts the shutter more precisely than that. [Edit: I have looked at the gray row values in Lr of the 11 files. The readings for the lightest patch are all withing a few tenths of the nominal Lr value of 89.2. That means that the a7RII metering is much more precise than 1/3 stop. Pretty impressive!]

It’s clear to me that the automatic exposure system in the a7RII can easily deal with the exposure requirements for consistent Macbeth chart results.

Colors in the real world? That’s another story, as anyone who’s tried to master the intricacies of exposure in situations where you’ve got to be bang-on in the camera, like with ‘chrome films. However, that’s really a different issue.

← Macbeth light dimming effects Some more color hills images →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2021
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike King on Metabones 1.26x Expander on GFX 100 with Otus 55
  • JimK on Diffraction and sensors
  • Barry Benowitz on Diffraction and sensors
  • Raymond on Fuji 45-100/4, 100-200/5.6 on GFX 100
  • CarVac on Diffraction and sensors
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Diffraction and sensors
  • CarVac on Diffraction and sensors
  • JimK on Diffraction and sensors
  • wSirsch on Diffraction and sensors
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100 conclusions

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.