the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / NEX-7 — Zeiss 24mm f/1.8 performance

NEX-7 — Zeiss 24mm f/1.8 performance

January 16, 2012 By JimK Leave a Comment

The Zeiss 24mm E-mount lens acquitted itself excellently with a low-contrast subject. Let’s see how it does with a normal tone range.

Here’s the overall image, made, like all the images in this post, at the lens’s best aperture of f/5.6 and ISO 100:

The center, at two-pixel-for-one magnification, is commendably crisp:

The upper left corner is sharp, too, but shows signs of chromatic aberration in the transitions from light to dark:

The upper right corner, with high-contrast, high-spatial-frequency branches, shows good resolution, but the chromatic aberration is even more obvious:

The Leica Elmar 24mm f/3.8 shows a lot less chromatic aberration at the corners and holds the contrast better:

The next image, of a solar array, serves as a distortion test, and the Zeiss does very well, with just a bit of pincushion distortion:

The next image is a flare test, with the sun right in the frame. Again, the Zeiss lens performs well:

Here’s a pixel-for-pixel look at the image near the sun:

And here’s a pixel-for-pixel blowup of the image less than half a frame height away from the sun. You wouldn’t know there was a strong light source in the frame:

Here’s an image made with the sun just out of the frame, and no lens shade. The flare with the lens out of the frame is actually slightly worse than with the sun in the frame. Note the absence of ugly artifacts caused by light bouncing around inside the lens:

And here’s what you see when you shade the lens with a hand:

Except for the chromatic aberration, this is very good performance for any lens on this sensor format. The Sony/Zeiss 24mm lens looks like a bargain.

 

← NEX-7 — three 24mm lenses compared NEX-7 — Zeiss 24 mm autofocus testing →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2021
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Robert Frangioso on Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt R on GFX 50R in infrared
  • Robert Frangioso on Why so few posts?
  • Ken on Noise reduction and downsampling
  • Robert Kuechle on Chronography video up
  • JimK on Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S
  • DanB on Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S
  • gideon on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • JimK on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • Gideon on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • JimK on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.