• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / OOF LED test won’t detect tilt

OOF LED test won’t detect tilt

July 13, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

A while back, I posted the following simple lens decentering test, using a out-of-focus LED:

Simple decentering test

There have been reports of this test not detecting lenses whose field curvature is not symmetric about the lens axis, but has a til component. There is no reason to think that the OOF LED test can detect tilt, but I thought I’d run a test anyway.

I mounted a Nikon 24mm f/3.5E PC-Nikkor on a Sony a7rII, opened the diaphragm up all the way, and made three OOF LED images with the lens centered, tilted 5 degrees right, and tilted five degrees left.

Here are the (cropped) images:

_DSC1699

_DSC1703

_DSC1701

You can see that the OOF image is shifted, but not distorted, by the tilting.

And, by the way, I don’t see any reason why the OOF LED decentering test would flag as bad a lens all of whose elements are decentered by precisely the same amount in precisely the same direction.

 

The Last Word

← Depth of field summary — part 1 Depth of Field summary — part 2 →

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    July 13, 2016 at 9:12 pm

    Thanks.

    In correspondence with Roger C. at LensRentals, he pointed me to a third component “Optical Imperfection”: spacing errors (SE).

    For more info, see:
    https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/09/there-is-no-perfect-lens/

    about 1/3rd down the article, in the section about:
    “The Causes of Optical Imperfection”

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Towards a quick, qualitative lens tilt test says:
    December 18, 2016 at 3:13 pm

    […] using a technique developed by a University of Kentucky professor and publicized on DPR. However, that method is insensitive to tilt. That’s a good thing if you wish to separate the measurement of tilt from that of […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.