the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / PhotoLucida 2009: the first day

PhotoLucida 2009: the first day

April 23, 2009 JimK Leave a Comment

I’ve just finished the first day of reviews and I’m a bit overwhelmed. Four formal twenty-minute reviews. Three informal ones by official roving reviewers. Uncountable sharing of pictures with other photographers.  A presentation at lunchtime that took precedence over lunch.

And that just got me to five o’clock.

The day finished with all 160 photographers showing work to each other and to anyone who happened to be at the Portland Art Museum. The PhotoLucida folks broke us into three groups and gave each group a table and an hour. The tables seemed well spread out before most of the people arrived, but there was soon a sea of viewers so thick that it was an effort to move.

The work was incredibly varied, and for the most part well executed. It was hard to believe that such variety could be achieved within the process of exposing photosensitive material to light. Photograms, cyanotypes,  pinhole photographs, Holga pictures, tack-sharp 39-megapixel captures. From 100% concept to totally visual and everything in between. From palm-sized jewels to 40 by 60 canvas prints that had to be rolled up to carry them to the reviewing table. I had the middle time slot, and by the time it came for me to set up, I was into visual overload.

I wasn’t quick enough to get a table with good light, but because I was in less-desirable area, there was an empty table next to mine. The next photographer over and I split it, so I was able to put out both the Nighthawks series and the PhotoCalligraphy work. There seemed to be almost equal interest in each, which was a bit disconcerting since Nighthawks is a fully fleshed-out series with three years of work in it, and PhotoCalligraphy is the result of six months of failures followed by two months of successes, all while I was mainly working on something else. Ah, well. At least there was interest.

At the end of the hour I was hoarse. I’d passed out a lot of brochures, had a lot of conversations, and was unclear on how well what I was trying to do with Nighthawks was getting through. PhotoCalligraphy is easier: it’s eye candy, and you either like it or you don’t.

I’m afraid that, at least in my case, the people at the end of the alphabet got short shrift.  I gave it another half-hour, and headed back to the hotel.

And the reviews? Taken collectively, at this point they make the Delphic Oracles look straightforward, although I am not lacking in strong opinions. I need to let it settle in and hear some more before I can make sense of it.  I will get there. Stay tuned.

The Last Word

← PhotoLucida 2009: getting there PhotoLucida 2009: the second day →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.