the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Previsualization heresy, part 5

Previsualization heresy, part 5

June 14, 2012 By JimK Leave a Comment

What are the barriers to a holistic approach to experimentation and image making? I’ve been talking about the blocks that we create in our heads when we accept previsualization hook, line, and sinker.

There are other, more real obstacles.

There’s the weight and bulk of photosensitive materials. If you’re backpacking with your 8×10, you probably don’t want to carry an extra hundred sheets of film so that you can experiment with shutter speeds on all your waterfall pictures. Even if you’re using roll film, cost is a consideration. Neither of these limitations applies to digital capture.

There’s also the opportunity cost of experimentation. As a rule, I don’t bracket f-stops or shutter speeds. I don’t have any problem getting close to the right exposure, and I’ve found that, except for completely static subjects, there’s usually one image in a series that’s the best. If I made a third of the images a stop over the nominal exposure and a third a stop under, there’d be a 33% chance that the best image would have the optimum exposure.

Similarly, if you’re photographing a once-in-a-lifetime event, or even one where you don’t have much time to get what you want, that’s not the time to try something wild and crazy. Instead, visualize what you want, and draw upon your vast repertoire of photographic knowledge – developed through experience and experimentation – to capture the moment in the way that gets you to your goal.

 

← Previsualization heresy, part 4 Previsualization heresy, part 6 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2021
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike King on Metabones 1.26x Expander on GFX 100 with Otus 55
  • JimK on Diffraction and sensors
  • Barry Benowitz on Diffraction and sensors
  • Raymond on Fuji 45-100/4, 100-200/5.6 on GFX 100
  • CarVac on Diffraction and sensors
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Diffraction and sensors
  • CarVac on Diffraction and sensors
  • JimK on Diffraction and sensors
  • wSirsch on Diffraction and sensors
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100 conclusions

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.