• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Really long adapted lenses on the Fujifilm GFX 50S

Really long adapted lenses on the Fujifilm GFX 50S

May 13, 2017 JimK 2 Comments

This is the 58th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

I’ve tested the Leica 280/4 R-mount tele and the 250/5.6 Superachromat on the GFX, and both did well in different ways. I have several longer full frame lenses that might perform credibly — or might not, due to their internal baffling. 

I’m not going to find out.

Why’s that? Because  the GFX doesn’t have in-body image stabilization (IBIS). When I focus 300 mm and longer lenses on the a7RII, I always turn the IBIS on to focus (I turn it off for the shot, though, since I always use these lenses on a tripod when they’re on the a7RII. Without the IBIS, there is too much shake for accurate focusing. When I tested the 250 SA on the GFX, the shake was so bad that I couldn’t reliably focus the lens. The GFX doesn’t have a tripod collar, so the vibration is magnified, but it’s clear to me that I’m not going to be able to  reliably focus a 500 on the GFX.

And, thanks, to the a7RII and its IBIS system, I don’t have to. 

If there are long native autofocus lenses for the GFX, they won’t have the problem with AF turned on. They’ll probably have optical stabalization built in, so they should be okay even with manual focus. 

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Two Leica R-mount 180s on Fujifilm GFX 50S OOF PSFs with the Lomography 58/1.9 Petzval lens →

Comments

  1. Ralf Scholl says

    December 25, 2019 at 10:40 am

    Would it be interesting for you to test the Leica R 280/4, the Zeiss Superachromat 250/5,6 or 350/5,6 or other long tales with the GFX 100?
    Since longer focal lengths than 250mm are still missing in the GFX system, and the GFX 100 has IBIS, this would be really interesting. (At least for me.)

    Best regards and merry Christmas 2019!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 25, 2019 at 11:46 am

      I have tested the 280/4 Apo on the GFX 50S.

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/leica-2804-apo-r-on-fujifilm-gfx-50s/

      I have also tested the 250 SA.

      http://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/zeiss-2505-6-superacromat-in-fujifilm-gfx-50s/

      I don’t have the 350 SA.

      If I were you, I’d go with the Fuji 250, assuming you don’t already have either the Leica or Zeiss lens.

      As to testing those lenses on the GFX 100, I would expect the same sharpness and less aliasing. The GFX 100 microlenses are about the same size as the GFX 50x microlenses.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.