the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony 12-24 f/4 OOF PSFs

Sony 12-24 f/4 OOF PSFs

July 8, 2017 JimK Leave a Comment

This is part 8 of a test of the Sony 12-24 mm f/4 FE lens. The test starts here.

A couple of  TLAs (three-letter acronyms) up there, huh? OOF you probably know; it stands for out of focus. PSF means point spread function, and is a bit more obscure. It’s what the camera does with a tiny point of light. For these experiments, my point source was a AAA LED flashlight about 15 feet away from the lens, which was focused as close at it would go.

At 24mm and f/4, I moved the camera around so that the light fell at various places in the frame:

 

The distortion is of the pincushion variety, and is quite different when the lens is focused as close as it will go and when it was focused much further away, as it was in the earlier distortion testing. It will be an interesting project to come up with a lens profile for this lens. You can see that not all the little blobs are round, and some have color tinges. Let’s look at the center one, then move one blog to the left until we get to the edge of the images, then drop down to the extreme corner below there.

Here’s the center. It’s got “onion rings” which usually indicates some aspherical molded elements. You’re actually looking at machining marks in the mold! Not a lot of color fringing, which is good. That bright ring around the edge is a sign of lack of smoothness in the bokeh.

 

 

A little to the left, and we’ve got some obscuring of the diaphragm giving a mild football shape, and anisotropic color fringing.

 

A little more, and both those things get worse.

All the way to the left, and the left side of the blob is growing. 

In the bottom left corner, it looks pretty strange.

If this were a prime lens, I’d ding it for this behavior. Since it’s a zoom, and a UWA one at that, I’ll give it a pass.

At 12 mm, I wasn’t able to get to the corner:

More pincushion distortion. 

Let’s take a closer look at the center blob:

It looks pretty good. Maybe the diaphragm is not getting completely out of the way. 

One blob to the left:

That looks good, too, except for the bright ring. 

Now we’ve got the bulging, and the color fringing that’s different on the inside and outside.

At the far left:

Not very good looking, is it?

One row down from there:

These PSFs are not impressive. But it’s a zoom, right? And at least it’s centered.

 

 

The Last Word

← Sony 12-24 f/4 FE on a7RII — more flare Fuji 110/2, 120/4, Zeiss 135/2 OOF PSFs →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.