• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a6300 — pushing in post at higher ISOs, single shot shutter

Sony a6300 — pushing in post at higher ISOs, single shot shutter

March 17, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

This is part of a long series of posts about the Sony a6300. The series starts here.

Now I’m going to do a test similar to the one in the preceding post, except that I’m going to start at ISO 12800. That’s the first ISO where the camera does some big time spatial frequency for noise reduction, so we’d expect to see some differences there. Because that transition occurs at the highest ISOs of this series, I’ll present the images in order of descending ISO and increasing post-processing push.

Here’s a full frame image to get you oriented:

ISO 1600
ISO 1600

I’ll also go right to the images with the +100 shadow move, at 200% crop.

ISO 12800, no push in post
ISO 12800, no push in post
ISO 6400, +1 push in post
ISO 6400, +1 push in post

If you look carefully at the gap between the blue and the grey spines, you can see that the ISO 12800 image has slightly less noise. If you look at the “Sierra Club” script, you can see that the decrease in noise has come at a cost of a decrease in sharpness. I think it’s a shame that the camera does that. If noise reduction is to take place, I’d mush rather have the choice of whether to do it, and how to do it, in post.

ISO 3200, +2 push in post
ISO 3200, +2 push in post

This looks the same to me as the ISO 6400 image.

ISO 1600, +3 push in post
ISO 1600, +3 push in post’

Not much difference

ISO 800, +4 push in post
ISO 800, +4 push in post

Also about the same

ISO 400, +5 push in post
ISO 400, +5 push in post

Now we’re picking up some added noise.

The A6300 is fairly close to ISOless in the region 400-12800. It’s best to stay away from ISO 12800 and above unless you want the camera to decide how best to do trade noise off against detail.

The Last Word

← Sony a6300 — pushing in post at low ISOs, single shot shutter Sony a6300 — more pushing in post at higher ISOs, single shot shutter →

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a6300 — more pushing in post at higher ISOs, single shot shutter | The Last Word says:
    March 17, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    […] the preceding post, I show a series of images with identical exposures at decreasing ISO settings with pushes in post […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.