• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a6300 — pushing in post at low ISOs, continuous shutter

Sony a6300 — pushing in post at low ISOs, continuous shutter

March 18, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

This is part of a long series of posts about the Sony a6300. The series starts here.

Yesterday I posted three series of images leaving the exposure the same, varying the ISO in full stop intervals, and pushing the images in post to make them have equal brightness. I used single shot shutter mode for those series, and proved — to myself, at least — that if you don’t cross the point where the Sony a6300 changes conversion gain (ISO 320/400) and if you stay away from the places at ISO 12800 and above where Sony applies low pass filtering to the raw files, that the a6300 is essentially ISOless, meaning that you’ll achieve just as low noise if you push in post as if you crank up the in-camera ISO knob.

That behavior was predicted by the read noise versus ISO curves for the camera. When I ran those curves in continuous shutter mode, the camera did not appear to be ISOless. Nothing like a few pictures to make sure.

Here goes.

I set I started at ISO 3200 with a normal exposure, left that exposure the same, and made images at ISO 1600, 800, 400, 200, and 100. Then, in Lightroom, I pushed the ISO 1600 image one stop, the ISO 800 image two stops, and so on, until I got to the ISO 100 image, which got a five stop push.

You can compare this test to a similar run I posted yesterday with single shot shutter mode.

Here’s the overall scene, as seen by the a6300 and a Zeiss Loxia 21/2.8, using Lightroom CC 2015.5 with default settings except for white balance.

S6301684-2

Now, we’ll crank up the shadows with a +100 shadow move and crop to a part of the image with some dark areas, and make a 200% enlargement.

ISO 3200, no push
ISO 3200, no push

 

ISO 1600, one stop push
ISO 1600, one stop push

You have to look hard to see any difference between the ISO 3200 and ISO 1500 images.

ISO 800, two stop push
ISO 800, two stop push

We pick up some more noise with the two stop push, but not much.

ISO 400, three stop push
ISO 400, three stop push

More noise yet.

ISO 200, four stop push
ISO 200, four stop push

There’s a big jump in noise here, since we just crossed the boundary where the a6300 changes conversion gain.

ISO 100, five stop push
ISO 100, five stop push

Matters are worse at ISO 100 with a five stop push.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a6300 — more pushing in post at higher ISOs, single shot shutter Sony a6300 — pushing in post at higher ISOs, continuous shutter →

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a6300 — pushing in post at higher ISOs, continuous shutter | The Last Word says:
    March 18, 2016 at 10:46 am

    […] the preceding post, I posted three series of images leaving the exposure the same, varying the ISO in full stop […]

    Reply
  2. Sony a6300 — pushing in post at higher ISOs, continuous shutter says:
    January 2, 2017 at 3:55 pm

    […] the preceding post, I posted three series of images leaving the exposure the same, varying the ISO in full stop […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.