the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7R corner smear with Zeiss 35mm

Sony a7R corner smear with Zeiss 35mm

December 11, 2013 JimK Leave a Comment

While waiting for the diffuser to arrive for testing the Adobe Flat Field workflow, I decided to take a peek at corner smearing. I took the lens that had given me a lot of trouble with corner color casts, the Zeiss Biogon 35mm f/2, mounted it on the a7R, went outside and made this picture, with the distance set to infinity, the f-stop to f/8, the shutter speed at 1/1600, and the ISO set to 400.

_DSC1925

I noticed that the corner color casts that looked so bad on paper and in the test shots didn’t hit me over the head in an actual photograph. As Jeff Kott pointed out in a forum (I’d link to it, but I can’t remember which one it was) yesterday, it’s possible that the blue-with-a-touch-of red casts that the a7R seems to favor are less noticeable in most circumstances than the redder casts of the NEX-7.

I looked at the center at 2:1. Nice and sharp. I looked at the upper left corner. Not so much.

Was the lack of corner sharpness the lens or the camera? I’d never been able to look at the corners at the a7R’s resolution before so I didn’t know. I stuck the lens on the M240, and made a picture at the same settings (except I used 1/1500 for the shutter speed, since the Leica won’t do 1/1600).

Here’s the Leica image:

L1004446

The shadows changed a lot in five minutes, but the upper right corner is lit about the same. The Leica image appeared to be about 2/3 stops darker than the a7R image, confirming something that I’d noticed in my M240 test: the Leica’s ISO settings are optimistic.  I’ve corrected for that in the images you’re looking at, but not for the corner casts or the light falloff.

I blew up the image and checked sharpness. The center was fine. The upper left corner was pretty good.

Before I shed bitter tears, I decided to try to compensate for the differences in resolution of the two cameras. I res’d both images up to 9000 pixels wide in Photoshop, using Preserve Details with no noise reduction. Changing the resolution of both images ensures that neither would have the advantage of avoiding interpolation.

I looked at the center of first the Sony image:

a7r Zeiss 35 ctr

And then the Leica one:

m240 Zeiss 35 ctr

The Sony is clearly sharper. And why shouldn’t it be? It’s got more resolution.

I looked at the upper left corner of first the Sony image:

a7r Zeiss 35 UL

And then the Leica one:

m240 Zeiss 35 UL

Now it’s not clear who wins. The Sony’s corner smearing may or may not be the reason for the loss of resolution from the center to the corner. It could just as easily be the lens, since the Leica can’t so any better.

It’s only a simple test, but it appears that corner smearing may not be too much of a problem with the a7R. Maybe I’ll try again with the 24mm Elmar or the 18mm Super-Elmar. They look like they have great corner sharpness when used on the M240.

The Last Word

← Sony a7R — taking stock Leica 18 & 24 on a7R & M240 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • Darrel Crilley on Fuji 100-200/5.6 on GFX, Nikon 70-200/@2.8E, Apo-Sonnar 135 on Z7, revisited

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.