• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII shutter operation

Sony a7RII shutter operation

October 27, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

I reported here on a7RII battery current draw measured statically. I have been working on developing ways to do dynamic measurements. I’m not there yet; I have been momentarily stymied by the camera’s apparent need for a low-resistance power supply when powering up, and I am having trouble providing such a low-resistance voltage source and still being able to measure a few tens of microamperes. I’ve got a roll of nichrome wire on order, which should allow me to make small changes in the value of small resistances in series with the voltage source.

In the meantime, I have something interesting to show you. Below are plots of the voltage from a third-party ac power supply with EFCS on and off:

 

EFCS on
EFCS on

You can see the voltage drop suddenly as the shutter is wound at the end of the exposure. Each division on the horizontal axis is a tenth of a second.

EFCS off
EFCS off

With EFCS on, you can see that the shutter gets wound twice. The first time is before the exposure, and the second time is after. The two operation occur a bit over 200 milliseconds apart. The shutter speed was 1/25 of a second (40 milliseconds), so it appears that the delay between the initiation of the first shutter wind and that of the second is about a fifth of a second.

The ac power supply ripple is considerable during the periods when the shutter is idle, but is reduced when the shutter is actually being wound.  It doesn’t always have a fundamental of a multiple of the power line frequency, so we may be looking at the camera’s current requirements changing quite rapidly. You’ll also note a change in the ripple just before and just after the shutter winds. I’ll probably have more to say about that when I get my current measurement scheme working. It looks like the nichrome wire won’t be here until next week, so be patient.

The Last Word

← A book report — printing the portfolio images A book report — portfolio image quality →

Trackbacks

  1. Dynamic Sony a7RII battery draw says:
    November 1, 2016 at 10:26 am

    […] draw, and it was clear that the way the current varied with time was interesting. When I did some rough dynamic tests of voltage variation in operation — which I took as a possible proxy for current variation — it appeared that the current […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.