the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Structure and creativity, revisited

Structure and creativity, revisited

May 27, 2012 JimK 2 Comments

Five years ago today, I posted some thoughts on creativity and constraints. You can read them here. Huntington Witherill wrote an eloquent dissent. It’s in a comment to the post.

Ten days ago, Brooks Jensen posted a podcast, the teaser for which was:

If creativity is a free-flowing, spontaneous activity, won’t a structure constrict the creative process? But, as Orson Wells advises us, “The enemy of art is the total lack of limitations.”

You can listen to Brooks’ podcast here.  Sounds like Brooks and I work the same way: structure helps us.

Anyone have other thoughts?

The Last Word

← Adobe Pixel Bender Res-ing down in one dimension →

Comments

  1. Jeff Wayt says

    June 15, 2018 at 6:59 am

    Look at sonnets. There is a framework and structure, iambic pentameter, etc. Haiku, has its structure. So many enjoy creativity within those limits. Music has gobs of rules, yet look at how much creative product exists in that framework.

    Anything with focus must have limits. It can’t map the universe on a medium. Art must have some truth abstracted and something novel. Without some truth, it is unrecognizable disorientation. Appreciation rises from relating elements to one’s own map of garnered elements in experience.

    I was in the third graduating class of the High School for Performing and Visual Arts in Houston that attracted artistic prodigies in 5 fine arts. The school started in an old synagogue, and the kids and teachers had to build its stage and classrooms to fit the work. The budget was severely restricted, equipment spartan. I keep in contact with many alumni whose recollection of their experience on a shoe-string romanticized the improvisational creativity they had to have.

    Some say real creativity comes from the fusion of interdisciplinary skills recombining elements in novel ways. This assumes knowledge of how those elements have been combined in the past.

    It is interesting to observe that so many of the technically proficient pianists I’ve met compose very little, while many song-writers can have little musical training. The Beatles could not read sheet music. Then there are composers whose utter mastery with musical vocabulary transcended its limitations.

    Knowledge itself is order, has its limits, and must be finite. Complete freedom is chaos. It’s difficult for me to enjoy white noise. Give me a signal any day.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Previsualization heresy, part 2 | The Last Word says:
    June 11, 2012 at 8:09 pm

    […] is to find a framing that works visually and expresses the photographer’s intent. As I’ve said here and here, working with constraints can be a creativity enhancer, and thinking hard about the edges […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.