• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Testing the Nikon 200-400mm f/4

Testing the Nikon 200-400mm f/4

May 18, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

I’m trying to find a zoom lens that works well for distant landscapes, sometime stitched, sometimes not. My initial experiments with the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-400 mm 1:4G were unsuccessful. However, after testing the known sharp Nikon AF-S 400mm f/2.8 under similar conditions and finding blur traceable to thermal atmospheric turbulence, I was ready to go back and try the zoom again under conditions that provided better seeing.

First, I tested the center sharpness of the zoom indoors with flash illumination:

200-400MTF50

The absolute numbers aren’t very good, but they are only slightly worse than I got when I tested the 400/2.8 with the same target and distance. The problem is that I can’t back up far enough to get the target distance to 50 or 100 focal lengths with this long a lens, and thus the target sharpness — or lack of same — starts to influence the results.

At least I know the two best f-stops for center sharpness. I went outside  this morning when it was calm and set up on this hillside about half a mile away:

_8105893

In the center at 400mm,  f/5.6 at 200%:

f/5.6
f/5.6

And at f/8:

f/8
f/8

That’s pretty close to pixel-level sharpness. Is f/5.6 a little better? Maybe.

In the lower left corner:

 

f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8

f/5.6 is a pretty soft, but f/8 is acceptable, considering that this is a zoom lens. . What about f/11? We’ll lose a bit in the center, but it might be worth it for the sides.

f/11
f/11

Helps a bit.  What’s it look like in the center?

f/11
f/11

Not bad. I can use either f-stop.

At 300mm in the center:

f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8

That looks fine. How about the corner?

 

f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8

Both of those look OK, with f/8 being a little better.

How about f/11?

f/11
f/11
f/11
f/11

I dunno. I think I’ll stick with f/8 at 200mm or so.

At 200mm in the center:

f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11

f/5.6 is the sharpest. F/8 is almost there. F/11 shows a little softness but is quite acceptable to me.

In the upper right corner:

f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11

F/5.6 and F/8 are pretty darned goo. F/11 is softer.

It looks like I’ve found an acceptable zoom for my landscapes. You won’t confuse the image quality with the Leica 280mm f/4 Apo-Telyt-R, but it’s pretty darned good considering it’s a zoom.

The Last Word

← EFCS without atmospheric effects EFCS in the real world with the Nikon 200-400 f/4 on the D810 →

Trackbacks

  1. EFCS in the real world with the Nikon 200-400 f/4 on the D810 | The Last Word says:
    May 19, 2015 at 1:51 pm

    […] I posted a set of pictures with the Nikon AF-S 200-400 mm 1:4G lens on the Nikon D810. The images were intended to get an handle on center and corner sharpness of that lens with a […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.