the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Traveling with the Leica M240, part 4

Traveling with the Leica M240, part 4

October 20, 2013 JimK Leave a Comment

Frame lines

The finder frame lines in the M240 are illuminated from within the camera, rather than from a window cut into it. That means that they don’t dim when a shadow falls over the window. Good. That means that they can be white or red (I like red). Also good. That also means that you don’t see any frame lines until you turn the camera on. Some say that’s bad, but it’s never been a problem for me. That brings me to…

Wake-up time

You can turn a D4 on as you’re lifting it to your eye, and it’ll be ready to take a picture when you are. Not so with the M240. The camera takes a second or two to wake up with live view off, and a bit longer with it off. It can be a problem for street photography, which I do with an optical finder. If you let the camera turn itself off after a period of no usage, you have to press the shutter release to wake it up, and then wait before the shutter will trip. You can tell the camera not to ever turn itself off, but then you run the risk of setting it down when it’s on and having a dead battery when you pick it up again. I found that it worked fairly well for me to turn the camera off when I wasn’t planning on taking a picture, and turning it on when I thought I might, but maybe I should have just disabled the auto-shutoff and taken my chances.

L1002025

Church Renovation, Gaspe, Quebec. 18mm SE, f/9.5 @ 1/1000, ISO 200

You need auto-shutoff when you’re using live view, because that mode drains the battery fairly rapidly.

Some have said that the camera wakes up faster with smaller SD cards installed. I’ve not tested this.

Battery life

The M240 has a 13.32 watt-hour battery. For comparison, the diminutive RX-1 battery has 4.5 watt-hour capacity, and you can’t turn live view off. The M9 has a 6.7 watt-hour battery, and you can’t turn live view on. The increased M240 battery capacity, while not up there with the much larger D4’s 22 watt-hours, means that you can be assured of at least a thousand images on a charge with live view off, and probably a lot more. With live view on, you’ll probably get three or four hundred, but a lot will depend on how much time you spend looking and how often you trip the shutter. With the RX-1, I’ve noticed that using the clip-on EVF extends the battery life. I would expect that to be true of the M240 as well, but I haven’t tested it.

L1002927-2

Boarded-up Window, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. 50mm ‘lux, f/8 @ 1/350, ISO 200

The D4’s battery is good for at least 3000 pictures on a charge. Unless the circumstances are highly unusual, you just don’t worry about the battery life. You put one in in the morning, and you’re good to go all day. With the M240, with live view off, you feel the same way, even with fewer pictures to a charge. The reason is that, with the M240, you don’t take as many pictures. The much slower continuous frame rate on the M240 means that I never use it, unless I flip the dial too far when I’m turning on the camera. The lack of autofocus means that there’s more time spent between images. So I think the battery life is great when you use the camera that way.

If you’re using live view, unless you’re parsimonious with your exposures, you’ll want a spare battery in your pocket when you leave for a day of picture-making. That’s OK; they’re light. Like all things Leica, they cost more than you think they should ($190 vs $140 for the much larger D4 battery), but we’re used to that, right?

The Last Word

← Traveling with the Leica M240, part 3 Traveling with the Leica M240, part 5 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • Darrel Crilley on Fuji 100-200/5.6 on GFX, Nikon 70-200/@2.8E, Apo-Sonnar 135 on Z7, revisited

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.