• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 Batis — walkabout

Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 Batis — walkabout

February 11, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

I went for a walk this morning with the a7RII and the Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 Batis. I’ll show you some pix, but first I want to say what a great fit this lens is for the a7x bodies. It’s not a big lens, but it’s not tiny. It doesn’t stick out in front of the camera as much as you’d expect, which is nice. But the greatest thing is that it is very light. It’s the opposite of the 90 ‘cron; when you pick that lens up, you’re surprise by how much it weighs, but when you pick up the Batis, you’re impressed by how light it is.

And, as far as I’m concerned weight trumps size in photography. I don’t mind carrying a somewhat bigger bag if it’s lighter.

The first thing I’ll show you is my solar array/distortion tester with the lens wide open:

_DSC7065

There’s no Lr lens correction in this or and other image in this post except the one immediately below. The distortion appears to be of the pincushion variety, and not strong.

Turning lens correction on helps:

_DSC7065-2

Why does it make the image brighter? Beats me.

Next, let’s look at a strongly backlit f/5.6 image:

_DSC6971

Zooming in on a hard edge:

_DSC6971-2

Is there green fringing? Hard to say.

Putting the sun is a place that often causes odd diaphragm images shows no problem at f/4.

_DSC6953

That odd shape in the lower center is a cloud.

At f/4 in extreme circumstances, flare is visible, but the lens basically behaves quite well.

_DSC6946-2

Before the walk, I had to make an image of the sunrise, such as it was.

_DSC6904

Zooming in on the lower left show sharp results:

_DSC6905

Is there any fringing? If there is, it’s not much.

Starting up a hill, lead by my traveling companion and shooting at f/4.

_DSC6960

Bella is a McNabb Border Collie, and looks good zoomed in:

_DSC6960-2

Upper left:

_DSC6960-3

Lower right:

_DSC6960-4

Some DOF problems at that aperture, apparently, but no fringing.

This has been a good year for shooting stars. Here we look at them at f/6.3, which is pushing it for DOF, but this is a lens test:

_DSC7038

The lower corners:

_DSC7038-2

_DSC7038-3

Next, we’ll see how the lens does on some test charts.

The Last Word

← Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 Batis — color fringing Another medium tele test — LaCA →

Comments

  1. Toh says

    February 14, 2016 at 8:28 am

    Hi Jim – I also noticed that my Lightroom default correction for the Batis also brightened both the center and the edges. Maybe the goal is to bring the effective t-stop to whatever f-stop the photographer had set?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.