the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Zony & Otus 55’s on a7R, D810 — evenness

Zony & Otus 55’s on a7R, D810 — evenness

May 28, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

There have been two controversies floating around the ‘net recently. Is the Sony/Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8 FE (Zony 55) the equal of the four-or-five-times-more-expensive Otus 55/1.4? Is the D810 somehow sharper than the a7R?

I’ve got my own thoughts on both issues, but rather than just bloviate, I prefer to do some tests and report the results here.

The first test is my informal real world scene, the one that makes my long-time readers yawn uncontrollably. Here it is with both lenses wide open on an a7R (I’m not showing this series with the Otus on the D810, because it looks the same as the same lens on the a7R when res’d down to web size.

All images were captured on RRS TVC-43 legs and an Arca Swiss D4 head, with RRS L-brackets on the cameras, and developed in Lightroom CC 2015 with ACR 9.0, with white balance set to Daylight and sharpening turned off.

 

Otus f/1.4
Otus f/1.4
Zony f/1.8
Zony f/1.8

There’s quite a bit of corner falloff in both cases, but the Zony is worse at f/1.8 than the Otus is two-thirds of a stop wider open.

At f/2:

Otus f/2
Otus f/2
Zony f/2
Zony f/2

The Zony has far more falloff.

At f/2.8:

Otus f/2.8
Otus f/2.8
Zony f/2.8
Zony f/2.8

The Zeiss is doing a better job of evenly illuminating the field.

At f/4:

Otus f/4
Otus f/4
Zony f/4
Zony f/4

The Otus is pretty darned even. The Zony is still struggling with the corners.

At f/5.6:

Otus f/5.6
Otus f/5.6
Zony f/5.6
Zony f/5.6

Pretty close now, with the nod going to the Otus.

Next up: sharpness.

The Last Word

← Process vs result Zony & Otus 55’s on a7R, D810 — edge sharpness →

Trackbacks

  1. Zony & Otus 55’s on a7R, D810 — edge sharpness | The Last Word says:
    May 28, 2015 at 10:02 am

    […] 55) and the Zeiss 55mm f/1.4 Otus ZF.2 lenses on the Sony alpha 7R (a7R) and Nikon D810 cameras. The overall scene is in the previous post. In this post, I ill present edge captures at various apertures from all  three combinations that […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.