the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / Z50 / Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms

Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms

November 12, 2019 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the third in a series of posts on the Nikon Z50. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z50”.

In the previous two posts, I looked at the read noise of the Z50 under various conditions. Now I will show you selected histograms from those samples.

At ISO 100, everything looks normal for a Nikon. Is is clear from the gaps in the red and blue channels that there is white balance prescaling taking place.

ISO 320 is just before the increase in conversion gain takes place, and these loot normal, for a Nikon camera. It is clear that there is some interpolation in the blue channel taking place after the prescaling, since two of the gaps in the histogram are partially filled in.

At ISO 400, the read noise decreases because the conversion gain has increased. For the first time, there is a gap in the green channels.

At ISO 1000, we see a gap in only one of the green channels. The read noise is looking nicely Gaussian.

Note the raggeness in the ISO 3200 second green channel. Something is going on there, but I don’t know what.

This is the last gapless green histogram we’ll see in this series. The combing in the second green channel indicates some kind of processing. That channel shares its rows with the blue channel where the PDAF pixels live, so the green combing probably has something to do with PDAF.

 

Digital gain rules the histogram.

Even more digital gain.

Looking at some long exposures at ISO 1000:

Up to and including 15 seconds, all the channels look about the same as they do at high shutter speeds except for the longer tail on the high side of the histograms.

At 30 seconds, dropouts in both green channels appear:

 

This is about what I’d expect from a Nikon, and it looks quite good.

Z50

← Nikon Z50 EDR, spectra vs shutter speed Nikon 16-50/3.5-6.3 on Z50 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.