• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z9 / NIkon Z9 EDR

NIkon Z9 EDR

January 26, 2022 JimK 8 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z9. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z9”.

One of the things that I do with a new camera to suss out how much spatial filtering exists is run a dark-field series at ISO 1000 at all timed shutter speeds. I did that today with the Z9, using single shot shutter mode, and 14-bit losslessly compressed raws. I’ll present the result as engineering dynamic range (EDR) for each of the four raw channels.

The red channel doesn’t have quite the dynamic range that the green channels do, and that’s because of Nikon’s white balance prescaling. This is a camera calibration technique that multiplies the red and blue channel counts by numbers that are burned into the camera at the factory. I think this is a brain-dead way to do this calibration; it would be more flexible to write the numbers into the metadata and do the multiplications in postproduction. But nobody asked me. At least the blue channel is not as affected as it  usually is in Nikon cameras.

Here’s the same set of curves for the Z7:

The Z7 has about 2/3 of a stop more base-ISO EDR than the Z9, but is about the same at the upper end of the ISO range.

Here’s a direct comparison:

The Z9’s High Efficiency format does not affect EDR:

Neither does HEF*:

Here’s a plot of how the EDR varies with shutter speed with EFCS turned off.

You can see that something happens at around half a second that raises the EDR. Probably some kind of digital signal processing: I’ll be looking at that. As the shutter speeds get longer, the EDR drops because of dark current.

Z9

← Nikon Z9 testing started Nikon Z9 dark-field histograms →

Comments

  1. Guangdong Pan says

    January 26, 2022 at 3:59 pm

    The Z7 EDR plot starts at a much lower value than the Z9’s ISO 100.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 26, 2022 at 4:09 pm

      There is an omission in this post: the ISO 64 and 80 values for the Z9. I’ll fix that tomorrow.

      Reply
    • JimK says

      January 27, 2022 at 8:13 am

      Fixed now.

      Reply
  2. Glen PS says

    January 28, 2022 at 2:55 am

    How does the EDR vs Exposure Duration compare to the Z7?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 28, 2022 at 5:14 am

      https://blog.kasson.com/nikon-z6-7/nikon-z7-lenr/

      Reply
  3. Steve Porter says

    January 30, 2022 at 7:38 am

    I’ve looked at all your results as well as those of Bill Claff’s—all very interesting. It looks from the curve that the EDR advantages of low ISOs (say, 64-125) vs. ISO 500 are even less in your results than Bill’s. Looking at all data can you summarize the meaningful advantages of shooting at ISO 64-125 vs. 500 for the Z9? Thanks!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 30, 2022 at 8:14 am

      I’ll be doing a visual demonstration of that very thig. Stay tuned.

      Reply
      • Steven Porter says

        January 30, 2022 at 10:08 am

        Thanks very much for this info. I really hope you do this very soon, as I am heading to Ecuador in 3 weeks with two Z9s. Obviously in the cloud forest one does not often get the chance to shoot at ISOs in the 64-125 range, but sometimes with perched birds it is a possibility. I am trying to decide if it is even worth the bother as opposed to just staying at 500. So very much looking forward to your thoughts!

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.