• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z9 / Nikon Z9 readout details

Nikon Z9 readout details

January 31, 2022 JimK 5 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z9. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z9”.

When I tested the Z9 scan time, I got some images like this:

They were obtained with this setup:

The Z9 was aimed at the oscilloscope, which had the time base set to 500 microseconds per division. The vertical input to the scope was a 10 KHz triangle wave, so there were five cycles of that wave per division.

It occurred to me that, by examining the image captured by the Z9 in detail, we could glean some information about how the Z9 reads out its data.

Above you can see the tops of the captured triangle waves on the trailing (right hand) edge of the ramp, where the camera is ending the exposure by reading out the data. There are repeated patterns there.

Let’s take a closer look:

Even closer:

You can see that there’s a 12-row cycle. I’ve marked the start of two cycles with the red arrows. I’m having a hard time figuring out just what’s happening, although it is pretty clear to me that the camera is performing analog to digital conversion on more than one row at a time.

 

If we look at the leading edge of the waveform, where the camera is beginning the exposure, we can see echoes of the same pattern.

 

There are some similarities to what I saw with the Sony a9. But there are quite a few differences.

Here’s another zoom in to a scope image, This time with the function generator aet to 1 Mz and teh scp=ope to 100 us/division, to get things smoother.

 

 

 

Now it looks like the rows are read out 12 at a time.

Z9

← Smallrig L-bracket for Nikon Z9 Nikon Z9 performance with household LED lighting →

Comments

  1. Eric says

    February 1, 2022 at 12:25 pm

    Is it exclusive to still or you see it in video frames too? If it doesn’t appear in video, it could be an evidence that 12 rows is a trick for faster readout at 14bit. Because we know they drop precision in video mode.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      February 1, 2022 at 12:38 pm

      I don’t use or test video features, so I can’t help you there. Sorry.

      Reply
    • Lucas says

      February 6, 2022 at 9:58 am

      In video mode, the readout is one row/ADC at a time at 12bit.

      Reply
  2. Yunfan says

    March 1, 2022 at 5:22 pm

    Hi Jim, excellent post!

    One thing I have been curious though: Nikon claims that Z9 has a 50 MP sensor, but the number of effective pixels is ~45 MP, same as D850. This, combined with the fact that Z9 can achieves very low EVF latency in 20 FPS continuous shooting made me thinking if Nikon Z9 allocated about ~6 MP physical pixels for EVF and AF only, and these pixels do not contribute to the final image. This theory is also in line with the “dual stream” technology that Nikon described. Would it be possible for you to design a test for this theory?

    Thank you!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      March 1, 2022 at 6:42 pm

      I haven’t figured out a way to do that.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.