• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIII / Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 50mm f/0.95 OOF PSFs

Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 50mm f/0.95 OOF PSFs

June 15, 2018 JimK 3 Comments

I did a brief report on the Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 50 mm f/0.95 lens a while back. I noted that the sensor in the camera I used, the Sony a7RII, couldn’t make use of all the light the lens gathered. In one of the DPR fora, a question arose as to whether or not that affected the out-of-focus (OOF) point spread functions (PSFs) of the lens.

I ran my LED flashlight test this morning:

The PSFs don’t look like evenly illuminated disks at all; they are brighter in the center and taper off near the periphery, like those of an apodized lens. Ignore the small sudden changes in brightness vertically; that’s due to the pulse-width-modulated flashlight.

Very interesting, at least to me. Maybe some optics expert can explain why the microlenses and the lens interact this way. Brandon?

 

a7RIII

← Sony a7III shutter latency Fuji 250/4 AF-S, AF-C static accuracy →

Comments

  1. Simeon Kolev says

    November 13, 2018 at 4:15 am

    You have to keep in mind that this lens performs best on BSI sensors. There are some strange darker edges of the bokeh balls with older models. Darker with magenta coloration.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 13, 2018 at 8:15 am

      The a7RII has a BSI sensor.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 50mm f/0.95 OOF PSFs — part 2 says:
    June 16, 2018 at 10:00 am

    […] I published a post showing unusual behavior of out of focus point spread functions (OOF PSFs)  using the Mitakon […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.