the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 50mm f/0.95 OOF PSFs — part 2

Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 50mm f/0.95 OOF PSFs — part 2

June 16, 2018 JimK Leave a Comment

Yesterday, I published a post showing unusual behavior of out of focus point spread functions (OOF PSFs)  using the Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 50mm f/0.95 on a Sony a7RIII.

In a PM, Brandon Dube had some interesting things to say about the effect.

I don’t know why it happens. It could be genuine apodization caused by poor coating performance at extreme ray angles (it is easy to get to e.g. 65 degree angle of incidence in an f/0.95 lens, coatings have major issues above 45 degrees). It could be related to the microlenses, though that seems unlikely since it is nonuniform over the frame. What it could be, and what I would bet more on, is that because it is a budget f/0.95 lens, the pupils are extremely aberrated. The highly defocused image is more similar to the pupil plane than the image plane, so an aberrated pupil makes the OOF PSF change appearance (blur, distort, etc).

A reasonable test would be to take a sequence of images very out of focus, somewhat out of focus, mildly out of focus, almost in focus, etc, and see if the attenuation remains. If it is pupil aberrations, it should conveniently disappear near focus. If it is related to the microlenses or coating issues, it should remain.

A neat example of the pupil aberration thing is that if you take a fisheye and manage to get something very out of focus, it often has severe chromatic aberration on the bokeh. This does not appear in the in-focus image, and is just a byproduct of a fisheye lens more or less necessarily having terrible pupil aberrations.

Here is the result of the test that Brandon suggested, on-axis, using a Heliopan variable ND filter to tame the LED light:

And here’s a closeup of some of the smaller PSFs:

It’s clear that the characteristics of the PSF change as we get closer to being in focus. The “haystack” cross-section of the PSF develops an annular depression. There’s a lot of LoCA, which may have some effect.

Analyzing this further is beyond my pay grade, but I’m posting it so others can comment.

The Last Word

← Fuji 250/4 AF-S, AF-C static accuracy Fuji 250/4 defocusing behavior →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.