the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / a7RIII / Sony a7RIII and Nikon Z7 shadow noise — numbers

Sony a7RIII and Nikon Z7 shadow noise — numbers

April 15, 2019 JimK Leave a Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z6 and Z7. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Nikon Z6/7”. This post is also about the Sony a7RIII; it’s in the drop-down menu, too.

I’ve been comparing the normalized shadow noise of the Nikon Z6 and Z7. I’m going to change things up a bit and compare the Z7 to the Sony a7RIII, which occupies a similar place in Sony’s MILC lineup. I will compare the sensitivities of the two cameras to make sure that different ways of calibrating the ISO settings between the two manufacturers aren’t skewing the playing field, but I’ll start out accepting the ISO settings at face value.

Base ISO on the Z7 is 64 and it’s 100 on the a7RIII. Here are normalized signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) curves for the two cameras a base ISO.

 

If you don’t understand these curves and want to do so, go back to the start of this series. If you don’t understand the curves and just want a rough idea of what you’re seeing here, there are a few things to consider:

  • Higher y-axis values are better — they mean less visible noise
  • The further to the left, the deeper the shadows
  • All the way to the right is the brightest exposure the camera can handle
  • Minimally acceptable SNR for small prints (about 8 inches high)   is marked by the horizontal line that intersects the y-axis at 3.3.
  • Differences in camera resolution are normalized out.

You can see in the plot above that the cameras are dead even in the deep shadows, and that the Z7 does slightly better as things get brighter. I don’t consider these differences significant.

If we set both cameras to ISO 100:

 

Now the Sony looks better across the board, with the greatest difference occurring in the deepest shadows.

The Z7 switches to high conversion gain at ISO 400. If we look at both cameras there, here’s what we see:

 

Now it’s a tie at the horizontal line, with the a7RIII doing better in brighter shadows, and worse in darker ones.

The a7RIII switches to high conversion gain at ISO 640. If we look at both cameras there, here’s what we see:

Now the Sony is ahead. This continues all the way up the ISO setting range:

 

None of these difference are a big deal, at least not to me. Bill Claff’s PDR tests for the two cameras yield similar, but not identical results. We use somewhat different methods.

 

a7RIII, Nikon Z6/7

← From PTCs to normalized SNRs Sony a7III and Nikon Z6 shadow noise — numbers →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.