• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a9II / Sony a9II EDR

Sony a9II EDR

November 4, 2019 JimK 9 Comments

This is the first in a series of posts about the Sony alpha 9 Mark II, aka the a9II. You can find other posts in this series by using the category list on the right, and selecting “a9II”.

The a9II arrived on Friday, earlier than I expected it. The packaging was the usual Sony box with the origami cardboard insert. Nothing fancy, but it does the job and it’s easy to unpack. I much prefer that kind of packaging over Apple’s precious fingernail-breaking stuff.  Does anybody else experience a twinge of regret while throwing the elegant Apple boxes away?

The ergonomics of the camera are the same as those of the a7RIV, except for the drive mode and focus mode dials on the top left of the body. Sony had the good sense to have a modal locking button on the new EC control, so you can have it spin freely if you wish, but they still have the old awkward press-and-hold-while-you-spin button for the drive and focus modes.

The first thing I did was check the read noise in various shutter modes. This was done with the body cap on the camera, in single shot shutter mode, at 1/1000 seconds at various ISO settings. I express the results as engineering dynamic range (EDR), which is full-scale divided by the read noise averaged over a 600×600 pixel area just far enough to the left from the center of the image to avoid the center column. I did that for all four raw channels.

Here are the results with the fully-mechanical shutter:

The increase in EDR at the transition from ISO 500 to ISO 640 is due to the camera’s increasing conversion gain at that point.

With electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS) engaged, we see essentially the same thing:

With the all-electronic shutter (ES), the channels are more evenly matched, and the EDR is ever-so-slightly lower:

Switching to continuous compressed mode, which the camera requires to achieve the fastest frame rate, and back to EFCS:

That’s a whole lot like the single-shot, uncompressed mode.

With ES engaged:

This is quite similar to the a9 EDR plots.

I then looked at the EDR as a function of shutter speed, with the camera set to ISO 1000 and EFCS engaged, with long-exposure noise reduction (LENR) turned off.

There is a glitch in one of the green channels at 5 seconds. Ignore that. The Sony “star-eater” digital signal processing doesn’t start until the shutter speed is 20 seconds or longer, which is quite an improvement over the a7RIV.

 

a9II

← Sony a7RIV precision in long ES exposures Sony a9II precision →

Comments

  1. Possi says

    November 19, 2019 at 6:04 am

    Is there any differenc in the S/N and Dynamic Range of the Sensor between A9 and A9II? I have the A7R3 and A7R4 and would like to add a speed option to my bag.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 19, 2019 at 6:37 am

      The a9 and a9II sensor silicon appear to be the same, or at least close enough that it doesn’t matter.

      Reply
      • Serg V says

        November 20, 2019 at 11:23 pm

        I can bet that A9II is just marketing trick.
        It is just software update in bigger body for $4500.

        Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a9II precision says:
    November 4, 2019 at 10:27 am

    […] is the first in a series of posts about the Sony alpha 9 Mark II, aka the a9II. The series starts here. You can find other posts in this series by using the category list on the right, and selecting […]

    Reply
  2. Sony a9II dark-field spectra says:
    November 4, 2019 at 11:50 am

    […] is the first in a series of posts about the Sony alpha 9 Mark II, aka the a9II. The series starts here. You can find other posts in this series by using the category list on the right, and selecting […]

    Reply
  3. Sony a9II “star-eating” says:
    November 4, 2019 at 12:58 pm

    […] is the fourth in a series of posts about the Sony alpha 9 Mark II, aka the a9II. The series starts here. You can find other posts in this series by using the category list on the right, and selecting […]

    Reply
  4. Sony a9II fixed-pattern read noise — short exposures says:
    November 5, 2019 at 9:41 am

    […] is the fifth in a series of posts about the Sony alpha 9 Mark II, aka the a9II. The series starts here. You can find other posts in this series by using the category list on the right, and selecting […]

    Reply
  5. Sony a7RIV fixed-pattern read noise — long exposures says:
    November 5, 2019 at 9:55 am

    […] is the sixth in a series of posts about the Sony alpha 9 Mark II, aka the a9II. The series starts here. You can find other posts in this series by using the category list on the right, and selecting […]

    Reply
  6. Sony a9II ISO behavior says:
    November 7, 2019 at 10:32 am

    […] is the sixth in a series of posts about the Sony alpha 9 Mark II, aka the a9II. The series starts here. You can find other posts in this series by using the category list on the right, and selecting […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.